Quantum darwinism [Quantum - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum)_Darwinism piece connects the quantum and classical world by saying that classical states with any classical bits are those quantum states that survived the process of decoherence, where decoherence is system's interaction aka entagling with the environment which results in loss of information. To minimize decoherence in quantum computers so that particle entaglement performing parralelized quantum computations isnt broken, one has to isolate the system and cool it down a lot. The survival of classical states is usually implemented by creating a lot of redundant information, so information about spin, location, or space can be located in the entaglement network we measure. Space and time can be seen as a quantum error correcting code. [Is Spacetime a Quantum Error-Correcting Code? | John Preskill - YouTube]([Is Spacetime a Quantum Error-Correcting Code? | John Preskill - YouTube]([Is Spacetime a Quantum Error-Correcting Code? | John Preskill - YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SW2rlQVfnK0))) Quantum entaglement can be seen as the glue of spacetime. [Entanglement as the Glue of Spacetime - YouTube]([Entanglement as the Glue of Spacetime - YouTube]([Entanglement as the Glue of Spacetime - YouTube]([Entanglement as the Glue of Spacetime - YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxY1PK4wW1I)))) Where local more entaglement encodes less distance and less local energy. [From Quantum Mechanics to Spacetime - Qiskit Seminar Series with Sean Carroll - YouTube]([From Quantum Mechanics to Spacetime - Qiskit Seminar Series with Sean Carroll - YouTube]([From Quantum Mechanics to Spacetime - Qiskit Seminar Series with Sean Carroll - YouTube]([From Quantum Mechanics to Spacetime - Qiskit Seminar Series with Sean Carroll - YouTube]([From Quantum Mechanics to Spacetime - Qiskit Seminar Series with Sean Carroll - YouTube]([From Quantum Mechanics to Spacetime - Qiskit Seminar Series with Sean Carroll - YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-ct1IlGUOw)))))) Second law thermodynamics defines the arrow of time. Quantum version of second law of thermodynamics posits that entropy corresponding to entaglement is increasing overtime. The more overall entaglement there is, the futher global "time slice" of the universe it is. [How Quantum Entanglement Creates Entropy - YouTube]([How Quantum Entanglement Creates Entropy - YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgYQglmYU-8)) I'm gonna stay with this framework. Other options in physics is loop quantum gravity, where spacetime is emergent from loops, more abstract quantized spacetime [Loop quantum gravity - Wikipedia]([Loop quantum gravity - Wikipedia]([Loop quantum gravity - Wikipedia]([Loop quantum gravity - Wikipedia]([Loop quantum gravity - Wikipedia]([Loop quantum gravity - Wikipedia]([Loop quantum gravity - Wikipedia]([Loop quantum gravity - Wikipedia]([Loop quantum gravity - Wikipedia]([Loop quantum gravity - Wikipedia]([Loop quantum gravity - Wikipedia]([Loop quantum gravity - Wikipedia]([Loop quantum gravity - Wikipedia]([Loop quantum gravity - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loop_quantum_gravity)))))))))))))) , or string theory where spacetime is certain configuration of strings. Standard model quantum field theory is good because its the most empirically validated and not flying in string theoretic abstractions where supersymmetry is in danger. https://imgur.com/1CefH68 ===Quantum formulation of the free energy principle=== What is the role of an observer? Let's formulate quantum version of the free energy principle. [ActInf Livestream #040.0 ~ "A free energy principle for generic quantum systems" - YouTube]([ActInf Livestream #040.0 ~ "A free energy principle for generic quantum systems" - YouTube]([ActInf Livestream #040.0 ~ "A free energy principle for generic quantum systems" - YouTube]([ActInf Livestream #040.0 ~ "A free energy principle for generic quantum systems" - YouTube]([ActInf Livestream #040.0 ~ "A free energy principle for generic quantum systems" - YouTube]([ActInf Livestream #040.0 ~ "A free energy principle for generic quantum systems" - YouTube]([ActInf Livestream #040.0 ~ "A free energy principle for generic quantum systems" - YouTube]([ActInf Livestream #040.0 ~ "A free energy principle for generic quantum systems" - YouTube]([ActInf Livestream #040.0 ~ "A free energy principle for generic quantum systems" - YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-qZYxSbJ38E))))))))) [Physics as Information Processing ~ Chris Fields ~ AII 2023]([Physics as Information Processing ~ Chris Fields ~ AII 2023]([Physics as Information Processing ~ Chris Fields ~ AII 2023]([Physics as Information Processing ~ Chris Fields ~ AII 2023]([Physics as Information Processing ~ Chris Fields ~ AII 2023]([Physics as Information Processing ~ Chris Fields ~ AII 2023]([Physics as Information Processing ~ Chris Fields ~ AII 2023]([Physics as Information Processing ~ Chris Fields ~ AII 2023]([Physics as Information Processing ~ Chris Fields ~ AII 2023]([Physics as Information Processing ~ Chris Fields ~ AII 2023]([Physics as Information Processing ~ Chris Fields ~ AII 2023]([Physics as Information Processing ~ Chris Fields ~ AII 2023]([Physics as Information Processing ~ Chris Fields ~ AII 2023]([Physics as Information Processing ~ Chris Fields ~ AII 2023]([Physics as Information Processing ~ Chris Fields ~ AII 2023]([Physics as Information Processing ~ Chris Fields ~ AII 2023]([Physics as Information Processing ~ Chris Fields ~ AII 2023]([Physics as Information Processing ~ Chris Fields ~ AII 2023](https://coda.io/@active-inference-institute/fields-physics-2023)))))))))))))))))) Entaglement is fully generally nonseparability of two quantum systems, therefore it is equivalent with bayesian coherence, correlation, emergence, conditional dependence, it giving information, it having causal influence. What exists is a network of conscious observers. An observer corresponds to a cone-cocone diagram, which is a mathematically abstract way of formalizing the notion of collective intelligence with various classifiers in hiearhical graph sharing same context in collective bayesian variational free energy minimization updating on a markov blanket. This observer is implemented by physics. Experiental subjective time and space is relativistic construct of each observer that can be seen as consequence of measurements of distances and causal structures [Qualia Research Institute](https://qri.org/)blog/pseudo-time-arrow [Qualia Research Institute](https://qri.org/)blog/hyperbolic-geometry-dmt [[1012.0535] Physics as Information Processing]([[1012.0535] Physics as Information Processing]([[1012.0535] Physics as Information Processing]([[1012.0535] Physics as Information Processing](https://arxiv.org/abs/1012.0535)))) and acts as error correcting code and gluing and relational contextualizing of internal states which corresponds to the general definition of entaglement. Spacetime that is objectively modelled in physics corresponds to very similar mathematical construct as written above. Relativity of time can be modelled as the speed of observer's internal state updating. Wavefunctions can be seen as nonrealist by superdeterminism, where the inherent uncertainity in the wavefunction is result from mathematically unpredictable chaotic behavior and if we knew initial conditions of the universe there wouldnt be randomness. I'm gonna assume no such hidden variables exist, wavefunctions can be seen as part of the observer's models and observers share wavefunction depending on the amount of entaglement, and shared to us nonchanging physical laws is what entangles us. When an observer, that corresponds to an open (nonequilibrium) quantum physical system, such as the cortical hiearchy or overall organism, is percieving, meaning its interacting with another system with a holographic screen, it becomes statistically inseparable with it, it entangles with it. Qualia experienced by observers is classical information. This physics model on which observers are running can be seen as just collective observers' model that approximates the world on which observers run on by the free energy principle, or that it doesnt touch fundamental reality at all because evolution maximizes for fitness and not truth [Exposing the Strange Blueprint Behind "Reality" (Donald Hoffman Interview) - YouTube]([Exposing the Strange Blueprint Behind "Reality" (Donald Hoffman Interview) - YouTube]([Exposing the Strange Blueprint Behind "Reality" (Donald Hoffman Interview) - YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ywG3pCd7tLM))) or a realist model on which observers run on. I'm gonna go with all of those at the same time but with focus on realism for more effective science. To transcend some sense of objective updating function determining some sense of objective time that creates speed of subjective relativistic times, we can also assume that by default only network of bayesian networks implemented by particles exist and time is just entaglement amount vector in this giant graph and local embededness of individuals is just statistical separability as mentioned above. Everything happening in all possible ways exists everywhere all at once beyond spacetime, locality, separability, individuality, illusory but also totally real to us emergent infered physical and experiental phenomena. ===Emergence of all other scientific fields inside this framework=== Let's apply free energy principle scalefree and create a nested hiearchy of markov blankets corresponding to things governed by evolutionary equations of physics. [Physics as Information Processing ~ Chris Fields ~ AII 2023]([Physics as Information Processing ~ Chris Fields ~ AII 2023]([Physics as Information Processing ~ Chris Fields ~ AII 2023]([Physics as Information Processing ~ Chris Fields ~ AII 2023]([Physics as Information Processing ~ Chris Fields ~ AII 2023]([Physics as Information Processing ~ Chris Fields ~ AII 2023]([Physics as Information Processing ~ Chris Fields ~ AII 2023]([Physics as Information Processing ~ Chris Fields ~ AII 2023]([Physics as Information Processing ~ Chris Fields ~ AII 2023]([Physics as Information Processing ~ Chris Fields ~ AII 2023]([Physics as Information Processing ~ Chris Fields ~ AII 2023]([Physics as Information Processing ~ Chris Fields ~ AII 2023]([Physics as Information Processing ~ Chris Fields ~ AII 2023]([Physics as Information Processing ~ Chris Fields ~ AII 2023]([Physics as Information Processing ~ Chris Fields ~ AII 2023]([Physics as Information Processing ~ Chris Fields ~ AII 2023]([Physics as Information Processing ~ Chris Fields ~ AII 2023]([Physics as Information Processing ~ Chris Fields ~ AII 2023](https://coda.io/@active-inference-institute/fields-physics-2023)))))))))))))))))) [[2303.04898] A variational synthesis of evolutionary and developmental dynamics]([[2303.04898] A variational synthesis of evolutionary and developmental dynamics]([[2303.04898] A variational synthesis of evolutionary and developmental dynamics]([[2303.04898] A variational synthesis of evolutionary and developmental dynamics]([[2303.04898] A variational synthesis of evolutionary and developmental dynamics](https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.04898))))) On the most bottom level, things correspond to particles, those form higher order things with their own markov blanket such as molecules, proteins, cells, neurons, functional brain regions, animals [ShieldSquare Captcha]([ShieldSquare Captcha]([ShieldSquare Captcha]([ShieldSquare Captcha]([ShieldSquare Captcha]([ShieldSquare Captcha](https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2634-4386/aca7de)/meta))))) , people, communities, states, superpowers, planets, galaxies and so on. Higher scale implies higher complexity of dynamics. The complexity can be deflated by various differential equations used in different scientific fields. More generally its nested cone-cocone diagrams. As we go to top scales in sciences we seek to minimize more and more free parameters, we want to be as closest as possible to deepest fundamental dynamics while not being lost in free parameters [2017 Buhl Lecture: The Physics of Life: How Much Can We Calculate by William Bialek - YouTube]([2017 Buhl Lecture: The Physics of Life: How Much Can We Calculate by William Bialek - YouTube](https://youtu.be/EmhRxeq9-_0)) So, if we wanna describe all natural scientific fields in one model using the quantum formulation of the free energy principle or overall quantum information theory and fundamental physics, we can use it to formalize the fundamental relationality of information in any other scientific discipline that studies arbitrary quantum systems that may or may not have classical correspondences in various models, where all models are useful approximations and evolutionary niches. [[2303.04898] A variational synthesis of evolutionary and developmental dynamics]([[2303.04898] A variational synthesis of evolutionary and developmental dynamics]([[2303.04898] A variational synthesis of evolutionary and developmental dynamics]([[2303.04898] A variational synthesis of evolutionary and developmental dynamics]([[2303.04898] A variational synthesis of evolutionary and developmental dynamics](https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.04898))))) All the mathematical models or differential equations used to predict dynamics in chemistry, biology, sociology, ecosystem science, astrophysics and so on are different special cases or approximations of those underlying quantum dynamics in quantum reference frames with holographic screens for communication that cause higher order causal information processing with agentic free energy minimizing modelling in nested hieachical bayesian graph and acting across scales. Can this be formalized as multiple cocone diagrams forming higher order cocone diagrams by informorphisms encoding higher order semantic information, a cocone diagram where nodes are themselves cocone diagrams, not just classifiers and semantics. Are the fundamental classifiers nonreducible information processing in physics, corresponding to the simpliest information processing of subatomic particles or excitations or loops or strings or something else, that together form collective information processing with shared context in a cocone diagram and that forms again higher order cocone diagrams up to theoretical infinity? Is this the nature of emergence of collective intelligences from collective intelligences? From (inert) simple interacting subatomic particles or other fundamental entity (that through entaglement form the quantum error correcting glue of spacetime) to atoms to molecules to cells to brain regions to brains to organisms [ShieldSquare Captcha]([ShieldSquare Captcha]([ShieldSquare Captcha]([ShieldSquare Captcha]([ShieldSquare Captcha]([ShieldSquare Captcha](https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2634-4386/aca7de)/meta))))) to communities to cultures to nation states to planetary systems to galaxies and so on, from lower order quantum information theoretic goals that bind and form a unit together getting higher order goals by this nested fractal cocone collective bayesian free energy minimizing information processing structure with top down and bottom up causality across scales performing active inference, where classical or quantum differential equations describing them tend to get more and more complex with increasing structural information processing complexity, but in some cases we can locate simple laws acting as good enough approximation for its context that can also sometimes be transposed across many contexts, is that convergent evolution of nature balancing between simplicity and complexity on all scales? [The Reality of Boyd’s Loop: Neuroscience, Complexity and Flow with Bobby Azarian, PhD | Ep 36 - YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQu6Khs48gI) If we assume symmetry theory of psychological valence in neural field theory and bayesian network doing Active Inference consisting of a model of self and others and the world and abstract representations that may or may not be connected with predicting the real world that have various degrees of success. Is culture stable patterns aka shared context among many individuals? [2023 Course: "Constructing Cultural Landscapes: Active Inference for the Social Sciences"]([2023 Course: "Constructing Cultural Landscapes: Active Inference for the Social Sciences"](https://activeinferenceinstitute.substack.com/p/2023-course-constructing-cultural))https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361691550_On_religious_practices_as_multiscale_active_inference_Certainties_emerging_from_recurrent_interactions_within_and_across_individuals_and_groups [OSF]([OSF]([OSF]([OSF]([OSF]([OSF]([OSF]([OSF](https://psyarxiv.com/ygptv/)))))))) [Frontiers | Small steps for mankind: Modeling the emergence of cumulative culture from joint active inference communication]([Frontiers | Small steps for mankind: Modeling the emergence of cumulative culture from joint active inference communication](https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnbot.2022.944986/full)) Is art and music and dancing creating consonant patterns in the brain while reinforcing cultural patterns, reducing uncertainity through knowledge giving text, reinforcing sense of self and emotional and ontological fundamental bayesian priors of the individuals that all want to selfevidence, find themselves out there, corresponding to baseline harmonic modes in the brain? Is ethics different evolutionary niches resulting from our internal evolutionary pressure to feel connected to the collective? Is philosophy in general exploring the formation of arbitrary knowledge bayesian graphs? Is law studying governing top down algorithms restricting or allowing certain types of behaviors of units, creating some shared context to minimize chaos? Is economics studying the dopamine of the society? Is journalism studying the attentinal system of our society? Is military part of our immunity system? Is wellbeing based in efficient uncertanity reducing colelctive behavior of various information processing subagents in the nervous system creating symmetrical dynamics that is interconnected with having shared context with other humans and overall collective reduction of basic needs among time?