[Reddit - Dive into anything](https://www.reddit.com/r/PoliticalCompass/comments/lcwg0f/every_us_states_political_compass_notes_in/) [Imgur: The magic of the Internet](https://imgur.com/tEpxufa) California is seen as auth right but Bay Area is the center of free startup economical and technological progress where tons of AI companies live. ===Science -> Humanity -> Governance -> Present state -> United States of America -> Economic axis=== The USA generally falls on the right side of the economic axis, favoring free-market capitalism. However, there are significant variations within the country, with some advocating for more government intervention in the economy. ===Science -> Humanity -> Governance -> Present state -> United States of America -> Social axis=== Socially, the USA is diverse, with a mix of libertarian and authoritarian viewpoints. While there are strong libertarian traditions emphasizing individual freedoms, there are also trends towards social conservatism and, in some areas, increased state control over certain social issues. ===Science -> Humanity -> Governance -> Present state -> United States of America -> Governing Artificial Intelligence=== [AI Declarations and AGI Timelines – Looking More Optimistic? - YouTube](https://youtu.be/9RmzlRRqfvU?si=SM6INutd1uDSC8fO&t=324) Investing into chief AI officers and researchers. Any model greater than 10^26 flops or using primarily biological sequence data and using quantity of computing power greater than 10^12 flops will have to report model security to the government. ===Science -> Humanity -> Governance -> Present state -> Europe=== [Imgur: The magic of the Internet](https://imgur.com/AW3wAeY) ===Science -> Humanity -> Governance -> Present state -> Europe -> Economic axis=== Europe is diverse, but many countries lean towards the left on the economic axis, favoring social democratic policies with more state welfare and regulatory involvement in the economy compared to the USA. ===Science -> Humanity -> Governance -> Present state -> Europe -> Social axis=== On the social axis, European countries tend to be more libertarian, especially in Western Europe, with a strong emphasis on individual rights, personal freedoms, and progressive social policies. However, variations exist, and some Eastern European countries can lean more authoritarian. ===Science -> Humanity -> Governance -> Present state -> China=== ===Science -> Humanity -> Governance -> Present state -> China -> Economic axis=== China presents a complex picture. While officially a communist state, its economic reforms have introduced elements of market capitalism, especially in urban and coastal areas. However, the state still retains significant control over key industries and economic policy. ===Science -> Humanity -> Governance -> Present state -> China -> Social axis=== On the social axis, China is more authoritarian. The Chinese government maintains strict control over many aspects of social life, including the media, internet, and public expression, reflecting a top-down approach to governance and social order. ===Science -> Humanity -> Governance -> Present state -> Russia=== ===Science -> Humanity -> Governance -> Present state -> Russia -> Economic axis=== Russia's economy has elements of market capitalism, especially after the fall of the Soviet Union, but the state still retains significant control over major industries and economic policy, placing it towards the center or slightly left on the economic axis. ===Science -> Humanity -> Governance -> Present state -> Russia -> Social axis=== On the social axis, Russia leans towards the authoritarian end. The government under Vladimir Putin has tightened control over media, political freedoms, and civil liberties, reflecting a top-down approach to governance. ===Science -> Humanity -> Governance -> Present state -> India=== ===Science -> Humanity -> Governance -> Present state -> India -> Economic axis=== India's economy has been moving towards the right on the economic axis since economic liberalization in the 1990s, promoting market economy and private sector involvement. However, the state still plays a significant role in certain sectors. ===Science -> Humanity -> Governance -> Present state -> India -> Social axis=== Socially, India is a democratic nation with a strong emphasis on civil liberties and political freedoms, placing it towards the libertarian end. However, there are ongoing challenges related to social inequality, religious tensions, and regional disparities. ===Science -> Humanity -> Governance -> Present state -> Global=== ===Science -> Humanity -> Governance -> Present state -> Global -> Economic axis=== Given these opposing trends, the global average might fall somewhere in the center of the economic axis, reflecting a mix of market economies with varying degrees of state intervention. ===Science -> Humanity -> Governance -> Present state -> Global -> Social axis=== Globally, there might be a slight tilt towards the authoritarian side, considering the population sizes of countries with more authoritarian governance (like China). However, the global trend has been gradually shifting towards more democratic and libertarian values over the past few decades, influenced by globalization, international human rights norms, and digital connectivity. ===Science -> Humanity -> Governance -> Present state -> Global -> Governing Artificial Intelligence=== Global AI safety summit happened, where all major AI companies agreed to not publish dangerous models, but different companies made slightly different commitments on controllability, biorisk, etc., but Google said "we will proceed only where we believe that the benefits substancially outweigh the risks". [AI Declarations and AGI Timelines – Looking More Optimistic? - YouTube](https://youtu.be/9RmzlRRqfvU?si=6RybR083xhxEqbz9&t=418) USA and China ban AI in autonomous weapons (if they really will follow that is another question) https://twitter.com/AkashWasil/status/1723688001811706199 UN plans banning autonomous weapons too [UN First Committee adopts draft resolution on lethal autonomous weapons | Digital Watch Observatory](https://dig.watch/updates/un-first-committee-adopts-draft-resolution-on-lethal-autonomous-weapons) ===Science -> Humanity -> Ideological force statespace model=== Processes emerge in evolutionary competition and eventually dissolve. Let it be galaxies, planets, species, organisms, societies, cultures, governing entities, learning scientific knowledge, technological progress,... In history we went from tribal wars to monarchies and much more as responces to eachother, taking an opposite turn or synthetizing, you can Google all entities mentioned here [[The History of the World: Every Year - YouTube]([The History of the World: Every Year - YouTube](https://youtu.be/-6Wu0Q7x5D0)) The History of the World: Every Year - Youtube], where each entity, like kingdoms, empires, totalitarian and democratic states and so on, can be seen as different sociocultural economic technological interacting Markov blankets. [History of the World Countryballs - YouTube]([History of the World Countryballs - YouTube](https://youtu.be/JJpr8m3Kmhk)) [FUTURE OF WORLD: 2023-10 000 - YouTube]([FUTURE OF WORLD: 2023-10 000 - YouTube](https://youtu.be/930mr7AQNAo)) [Ultimate Alternate Future Of The World [Perfected] Map 2020 - 20001 究極版・空想世界未来地図 REUPLOADED IN 2022 - YouTube]([Ultimate Alternate Future Of The World [Perfected] Map 2020 - 20001 究極版・空想世界未来地図 REUPLOADED IN 2022 - YouTube](https://youtu.be/ocV2QInXUxw)) Let's explore what ideologies and movements as forces shaping the world emerged in evolutionary competition and what have the currently biggest influence on the evolution of humanity, or all of sentience in general, what forces pose risk to our system's sustainability and what are the solutions that are being enacted, and what are the potential utopian futures if we go through the artificial intelligence revolution correctly. [[File:Futureofagi.jpg|1000px|Alt text]] [Imgur: The magic of the Internet](https://imgur.com/mPbBldH) [Imgur: The magic of the Internet](https://imgur.com/18JEGoB) [List of political ideologies - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_ideologies) [List of Ideologies - Polcompball Wiki](https://polcompball.wiki/wiki/List_of_Ideologies) [List of movements - Polcompball Wiki](https://polcompball.wiki/wiki/List_of_movements) [List of political ideologies | Particracy Wiki | Fandom](https://particracy.fandom.com/wiki/List_of_political_ideologies) Control is a statistical force in a dynamical system that is centralized (dictatorship, king, totalitarian regime), semidecentralized(democracy, competing corporations, nationstates), decentralized (anarchy, anarchocommunism, anarchocapitalism, direct (digital) democracy) (spectrum) by: battling or cooperating government/s (chosen by people not directly in control), king/s (not chosen, permanent family), corporation/s (emergent economically), person/s (emergent culturally), techgiant/s (emergent technologically, control via technology (AI companies of the future)), other authorities (science, philosophy,...) (or some combination on a spectrum) which is more individualistic (with diverse forces competing or cooperating in harmony)(anarchocapitalism, competing nations) or collectivistic (similar forces merging into one) (anarchocommunism, communist dictatorship) (bottomup collectivism/individualism vs topdown collectivism/individualism) or technology will allow humans merging into collective hivemind brain governing or being wireheaded or instead of us controlling or coexisting, technology (AI) or nature (earth life) or alien species or universe (natural causes, entropy) (or some combination on a spectrum) governs us or destroys us or we merge with or become it (are you ready to become collective hivemind merging with artificial general superintelligence and then merging with Gaia and then eventually the whole universe becoming pure transhumanecolovium matter, all values included, your qualia pocket will be transported to a multiverse branch custom tailored to perfectly satisfy them) (or some combination on a spectrum), or humans or all of life goes extinct from existencial risks on culture (regionism, nationalism, globalism, humanism, sentientism), economy (regulated, free market, crypto), technology (regulated, free progress, gov investments, transparency, closed source to prevent harm, open sourcing for democratization and innovation), environment (regulating its breakdown, not caring about it, it affecting us), science (gov investments), philosophy (or some combination on a spectrum) all of that has certain end goal: stays in its current state (conservatism), accelerated change as fast as possible (progressivism) (growth, degrowth, transformation (one culture to other)) given different conditions (considering various risks ultimately vs not at all)(spectrum) (or some combination on a spectrum) according to different ethical value systems (humans, nations, races, animals, technology, AIs, sentient matter, intelligence, capital, nature, environment, science, nothing, antinatanilism) which creates different levels of environmental, economical, technological, cultural sustainability (environmental, wellbeing of humans, animals, no big existencial risks, wars, or sustainability of intelligence could mean accelerate AI at all costs replacing us if that wont lead to destruction of most of advanced intelligence instead), wellbeing (sadness from opression (of individuals or nations) and less freedom to do and express by regulations and monitoring, happiness with government and its culture and economic regulation for benefit of people, sadness from not being told what to do, happiness from total freedom to do anything) transformation and risks (existencial (bioweapons, cyberweapons, pandemics, nanotech, nukes, climate change, social and sensemaking disintegration, fragility of fundamental infrastructure, AI (accelerating other risks, alignment, uncontrollability, being too powerful and easy to get and used as weapon, misinformation, manipulation, censorship, stabilizing authroitian regime, collapsing existing safeguards and our overall systems too fast))) to different valued entities that has a degree of stability depending on the influence of all the other forces (current positions of leaders in power are storngly stabilized by tons of safety checks, emerging attempts at seizing power get halted fast, overly corrupted governments can disintegrate, existencial risks can disintegrate it all, inability to adapt to technologcal progress is transformative on social, economic, cultural levels) In general, control in the world is a set of forces, that have origin with a structure on a centralized to decentralized spectrum, each acting on different sets of variables Force (ideology) consists of existing unwanted forces (free bad risky to all agents, too much regulations halting progress, polarization, distrust), existing wanted forces (healthcare and social support, not totally controlled market, attempts to revolute, intelligence explosion), proposed wanted forces (more coordination, progress in science, technology, meaningful jobs and overall activities for all, automation of boring stuff, privacy, autonomy, wellbeing, progress, sustainability, unity, diversity, good education for all, inclusivity, rational planetary decision making, sustainable growth, efficiency, security, meaningful community, shared resources, UBI, deserved resources, individual freedom, nation freedom, global coordination against risks, monitoring biorisk, benevolent altruistic governance, intelligence enhancement, transhumanism, connection with nature, bliss, good people in influencal entities, converting the whole universe into wellbeingium (matter experiencing only wellbeing, meaning, connection, novelty, sacredness, love, creativity, interestingsness, knowledge, selfactualization, truth, bliss, pleasure, peace, equaminity, safety, positive valence) with no more sufferium), proposed unwanted forces (suffering, extinction, global or local oppresion, violence, inequality (on economical, cultural, technological, knowledge, intelligence levels), radical jobloss in capitalist economy, regulatory capture, social fragmentation, bad mental health, loneliness, blind arms race, overdependence on technology AI and other things, overregulation, overmonitoring, disintegration of safety checks) proposed forces to achieve wanted forces (renewable energy, carbon pricing, AI governance, biorisk monitoring infratsructure, support for startups, support for people that cannot add economic value, donating to good causes, helping good causes, politically supporting good causes, teaching about good causes, creating infrastructure for good causes, creating conditions for good causes, voting, researching, engineering), existing forces to achieve wanted forces (charities, science labs, tech labs, good elected politicians, good people in influental entities), existing bottleneck forces (sociopaths having manipulative advantages in power (economic, governing, status), changing current state takes long transformation, skills, money, power, power in numbers of people), and their interactions with all other forces (accelerate technology vs pause technology, free vs governed technology and economy, traditional values vs trancending humanity) Each force is made out of other lower level forces and creates other higher level forces. In practice, political systems include gazilions of such interacting forces that forms them (international coordination entities, national governments, regional governments, interacting corporations, technology, the people, structure of your brain) Getting acceptance or resistance that weakens or reinforces them from other forces. Total centralization isnt worth it, as one person alone is weak, he has to have a semicentralized group aligned with his interests. Absolute centralization would be one atom governing the whole universe. Absolute decentralization would be all atoms having the same degree of causal power on every other atom like any other atom. ===Science -> Humanity -> Ideological force statespace model -> Example: Global coordinationism against existencial risks=== Force: Name: Global coordinationism against existencial risks Existing unwanted forces: "Not enough coordination leading to increasing catastrophic risks of life going extinct" (given certainity in doom being X% given xyz) "Attempts to stop global coordination" Interactions with other forces "Regulatory capture" (x% given xyz) Existing wanted forces (predicted or real): "Attempts at global coordination": Proposed wanted forces: "Coordinated global culture with safeguards against catastrophic risks" Interactions with other forces: Competition with "Individualistic culture" Proposed unwanted forces: "Uncoordinated chaos" "Orwellian dystopia" Proposed forces to achieve wanted forces: "Creating coordination technologies." "Reinforcing or creating political party supporting global coordination." "More AI safety summits" Interactions with other forces: Existing forces to achieve wanted forces: Future of Humanity Institute's Nick Bostrom's lectures UN AI safety summit (certainity in being real being 99.99% given xyz) Strength: "Incentives to big AI labs" (x% given xyz) Stability: "Fades away overtime" (given population memory and anti global coordination forces) Interactions with other forces (predicted or real): Competing, Cooperating, Disallowing, Reinforcing Existing bottleneck forces: "With the enormous size of humanity and existing control being rooted everywhere, creating more global coordination requires tons of people acting from many sides for a change" Interactions with other forces ===Science -> Humanity -> Possible futures=== ===Science -> Humanity -> Possible futures -> Governing technology=== Technology will probably be the most influencing factor of the future. We can let technological progress evolve without any restrictions or totally control and regulate or totally stop it. Something in the middle will happen, but what kind of middle is the question. Predicting the capabilities and externalities of technology and how it will edit our system is hard to predict. ===Science -> Humanity -> Possible futures -> Governing technology -> Regulate and control everything Depending on if you see emerging AI technology as powerful as scissors, or the internet, or like the nuclear weapons, you will have different views on how controllable and potentially harmful it is. Some people propose that its fundamentally uncontrollable, or that in its usage, the harmful uses will be much bigger factor than the ===Science -> Humanity -> Possible futures -> Governing technology -> Open source everything We can let technological progress evolve without any restrictions, but we risk the chances of it not being sustainable and us selfdestrucing ourselves on all levels in the extreme. We should probably steer it at least in some way to prevent some of the risks. Some people argue that all of that is bad. Some people argue that we need to accelereate AI in order to solve all other existencial risks like climate change, nukes, biorisk etc. by solving all of science and politics that way, but others argue that will only accelerate all these other risks. Both is possible, middle way will probably happen, but what kind of middle way? Some people argue we are fundamentally unsistainable and us selfdestrucing as fast as possible is the only way, as AI replacing us will save us. ===Science -> Humanity -> Possible futures -> Platou=== ===Science -> Humanity -> Possible futures -> Global dystopia=== ===Science -> Humanity -> Possible futures -> Interacting dystopias=== ===Science -> Humanity -> Possible futures -> War chaos===