I first start with no assumptions at all. I map out lots of popular philosophical assumptions: ontologies, epistemologies, ethical theories, models of identity. I choose the most optimal set of assumptions for doing science: empiricism, bayesianism, epistemic humility, physicalism unified with computationalism, panpsychism, emergentism, pragmatism, wellbeing utilitarism, closed, empty and open individualism together. I map out foundations in science, such as logic: classicl, constructivist intuistionic homotopy type theory, and mathametical foundations: (ZFC) set theory, category theory I map out models used in physics: classical mechanics, statistical mechanics ((nonequilibirum) thermodynamics), information theory, relativity, cosmology, quantum mechanics, quantum information theory, and their unity: quantum field theory (axiomatic, standard model), quantum darwinism, spacetime from entaglement, loop quantum gravity, supersymemtry, string theory, holographic principle, asymtotic gravity, wolfram physics project, amplituhedron, quantum free energy principle, with the focus on standard model quantum field theory, but with spacetime from entaglement and quantum darwinism with classical and quantum free energy principle across scales using unity of superdeterminism and quantum bayesianism interpretations of physics. I map out approaches for weak emergence and studying system's dynamics on a higher more abstract level or using an approximation: Effective Field Theory, Renormalization Group, Pointcare Map, Petrubation theory, Free energy principle. I take scalefree laws: (quantum) free energy principle, classical physics (fluid dynamics, harmonic analysis) and other tools used in chemical physics, neurophysics, biophysics, social physics, econophysics to frame other scientific fields on other scales studying atoms, molecules, proteins, cells, neurons, functional brain regions, animals, people, communities, states, superpowers, planets, galaxies with their unique differential equations. I map out approaches to immortality. I map out models of neurophenomenology (empirically testable models of consciousness, sentience, sapience) with the focus on levels of analysis (implementational, algorithmic, computational, phenomenological): Predictive processing, free energy principle, Conductance-based model, Nonequilibrium quantum brain dynamics, Orchestrated objective reduction, Holonomic brain theory, Shrondinger's Neurons, Neural field theory, Integrated information theory, Global workspace theory, Adaptive resonance theory, Topological segmentation, Higher-order theories of consciousness, Reentry, Sensorimotor Theory. There I pick quantum free energy principle running on standard model quantum field theory combined with neural field theory bound by topological segmentation of information processing networks with perception of an observer and binding as general entaglement of two unseparable quantum computational systems interacting. I map out current paradigms in neuroscience. I map out what's the state of the art in AI: transformers, neuromorphic engineering, active inference. How do the biological intelligences compare to artificial intelligences: flexible adaptible architecture constructed from stratch in process of selforganization, resonance network governed by neural field theory, by evolution preinstalled priors and heuristics and metaheuristics to minimize training data, global emotional processing, metaawareness, embodiment, mutimodality, planning, less "autism", self and other model, learning change in dynamic qualia streams instead of static snapshots, metastable coherence in some ground truths, needs of being surviving in the universe with others instead of imitating text on the internet, being directed by hundreds of physiological, dozens of social and a few cognitive needs that are implemented as reflexes until we can partially transcend them and replace them with instrumental behavior that relate to our higher goals. Xenobots live on the boundary between biological and artificial machines. I map out causes and models of wellbeing: good Active Inference model, symmetry theory of valence, wellbeing at the edge of chaos, genes, adequate brain network connectivity for flexible adaptible communication, learning to relax, having accepting environment, having direction in life. I map out models for neurodiversity: autism, schizotypicity, ADHD, low and high energy depression, bipolar. I map out models for meaning, agency, free will, love and other psychological constructs. I map out models used in psychology (big five personality model), psychotheraphy (gestalt, internal family systems) and frame it in the statistical physics model. I map out models of meditation and psychedelics: focused attention, open monitoring, nondual, therapy, learning, intellectual exploration, experiental exploration, finding or creating meaning, rest, freeying dissolution, getting better local minina, tools to transform, weaken or strenghten topological beliefs through annealing: inquiry into topological structure of experience's epistemic agent hub catching sensations, mindfulness, love and kindness, gratefulness, deity visualization and merging, nondual love, nondual deconstruction, loving reconstruction. I map out conteplative traditions: Stoicism, Mindfullness, Theravada, Mahayana, Vajrayana, Zen, Taoism, Atthakavagga, Ajivika, Dzogchen, Postrationalism, QRI. I frame different assumptions our brains can assume in the meta context of cognitive science. I map out different popular mental frameworks, cultures (west, east) , religions (christianity, buddhism), ideologies (left, right). I map out models used in sociology with the focus on social physics, Active Inference, evolutionary game theory, gauge theory and levels of analysis: technology, economy, law, governance, culture. What makes the most succesful cultures: internal and external positive/zero/negative sum dynamics that do coordinated violence effectively at scale (before it was mostly physical, now it is mostly economic, diplomatic, technological,...) I map out crises: poverty, economical, housing, environmental, geopolitical, energy, immigration, eductional, sensemaking, capability, legitimacy, meaning, teen mental health, inequality. And risks: pandemics, cyberweapons, biotechnology, ecosystem collapse from climate change, nuclear war, sensemaking and coordination failures, population wellbeing decline, adaptability, loss of social cohesion, meaning, loneliness, polarization (culture war), food and water scarity, breakdown of essencial infrastructure, misuse of artificial intelligence or other powerful tools used as destructive weapons (mainly Cambridge Analytica like psychological mapping and exploiting ingroup polarizing manipulation on social media for political advantage), AI incopetence, unaligned artificial general superintelligence, failure to integrate economical and environmental migrants. I map out solutions to cooperation coordination failures (Moloch), polycrisis (interconnected web of crises), metacrisis (underlying pattern under crises) in general that I argue should work in synergy: strenghtening democracy, reform of economy, media, social media, laws (political economy), parenting, decarbonization, degrowth, environment (regenerative economy), mental health, technology, slow down/pause/stop automation, slow down/pause/stop AI, accelerate AI, AI safety (AI alignment, AI copilot, AGI overlord, not building AGI (without understanding existing AIs?), adapting to postA(G)I world with culture and governance, structure of cities, cultural transformation: moral circle expanding by compassion, unifying languages, visions ( togetherness in this world full of problems we face together, and shared good future utopian globalist vision), meaning, secular religion, destabilizing narrow attention by education or meditation, power checked benevolent governing structures (cooperative regulations), automation allowing universal basic income, game theoretically stable optional wireheading infrastructure, resilient foods and clean water, resilience to crises and risks, education (communication of all of this to relevant policymakers, politicians, wealthy impactful people (generating economic incentives), general public through schools and informal education, creating ground between academia, policymakers, stake holders, and general public), mass AI powered quality science and systems science and mental health education grounded in reality to fight epistemic breakdown and molochian multipolar traps, with the focus on exponential tech's AI, education, democracy, culture. I map out ways to prepare and solutions to symptoms of the metacrisis: infrastructure for if things go wrong to avoid extinction, things like carbon capture. I map out what to do when things go wrong: nuclear winter. I map out acions against the metacrisis: learn, find people, join projects, donate, propagate, spread, educate, recruit. I map out various future timelines: business as usual, global totality (Russia), chaos (Somalia), stable liberal democracy by educated disincentivizing overly competing shorttermist nonaltruistic sociopathic selfcentered uneducated cancerous agents on regenerative economy, extinction, degrowth, returning to old ways, supergrowth with transhumanist transcendental longtermist utopia. I think about the current state of science with replication crisis under everything, where standard model quantum field theory is the best science we have, not forgeting bayesianism with epistemic humility, and seeing sociology and a lot of our models in general as more about forming the future than predicting it, arguing that us having fundamental assumption that future can be shaped into turning out well also increases the chances of that actually happening, making doom unjustified. I map out ways to solve humanity's biggest issues while not burning out and keeping good mental health: learning to apprecitate the present moment and sacredness of life, learning to rest, regenerate, get stronger where learning to temporarily turn of all structures in the brain with focus on those encoding what might be going wrong in society, inducing motivation by becoming in love with and adding to the beauty of life, becoming integral part of it. I end it with my story and transcendence into nondual love for all that is! [[File:Futureofagi.jpg|1000px|Alt text]] A meme where I tried to steelman various big voices in the future of artificial general intelligence discourse and put them on a political compass meme where various hot takes lie on the spectrum of mainly focusing on probability of AI doom versus probability of AI utopia scenarios and how expanded one's moral circle of concern is across space, time, and systems. =Newest book version= Beggining technical note: Each chapter is divided into: - Layman description: If you want just very simplified highlevel less technical overview, this might be for you. - Description only in introduced language and concepts that is linear, bottomup: This will try to present each chapter from first principles n as linearly structured form as possible. Read this first if you're not familiar with most concepts used in the other ones. - Description only in introduced language and concepts that is nonlinear, bottomup: This will be mostly used to unify previous chapters, which is done in nonlinear way. - Description in all concepts that is nonlinear, topdown: This will assume knowledge of many concepts before introducting them, which might be useful if you already have a certain background for the concepts! - Main links: Main resources on which the chapter is build on, you can start here ass well. ==Newest structure work in progress== ===Technical note=== ===Intro and structure=== ===No assumptions, any knowledge, structurelessness potential=== ===Philosophy -> Ontologies=== ===Philosophy -> Epistemologies=== ===Philosophy -> Ethics=== ===Philosophy -> Identity=== ===Philosophy -> For science=== ===Philosophy -> For science -> Hiearchy of sciences=== ===Philosophy -> For freedom=== ===Philosophy -> Unity=== ===Philosophy -> Other=== ===Mathematics -> Foundations=== ===Mathematics -> Foundations -> Logic=== [RationalWiki]([RationalWiki](https://rationalwiki.org))/wiki/Logic ===Mathematics -> Foundations -> Logic -> Classical logic=== ===Mathematics -> Foundations -> Logic -> Constructivism=== ===Mathematics -> Foundations -> Set theory=== ===Mathematics -> Foundations -> Set theory -> Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory=== ===Mathematics -> Foundations -> Type theory=== ===Mathematics -> Foundations -> Category theory=== ===Mathematics -> Foundations -> Mathematical logic=== ===Mathematics -> Foundations -> Paradoxes=== ===Mathematics -> Foundations -> Other=== ===Mathematics -> Disciplines -> Number theory=== ===Mathematics -> Disciplines -> Geometry=== ===Mathematics -> Disciplines -> Algebra=== ===Mathematics -> Disciplines -> Calculus and analysis=== ===Mathematics -> Disciplines -> Discrete mathematics=== ===Mathematics -> Disciplines -> Statistics=== ===Mathematics -> Disciplines -> Other=== ===Science=== ===Science -> Mathematics=== ===Science -> Physics=== Let's delve into physics. Wikipedia's definition of physics is: The natural science of matter, involving the study of matter, its fundamental constituents, its motion and behavior through space and time, and the related entities of energy and force. [Imgur: The magic of the Internet]([Imgur: The magic of the Internet](https://imgur.com/a/Z5ZjbDa)) We will slowly build all machinery used to predict motion of objects. If you're not familiar with any of these, wait for other chapters. Classical mechanics studies average sized objects moving at average speeds - speeds are much lower than the speed of light, sizes are much greater than that of atoms, yet very small in astronomical terms. Relativistic mechanics studies big objects moving at fast speed. Quantum mechanics studies small objects moving at slow speeds. Quantum field theory, a type of relativistic quantum mechanics, unification of special relativity and quantum mechanics, studies small objects at high speeds - Standard model maps out fundamental particles and forces on the lowest level of reality. We still can't unify gravity (general relativity) with quantum mechanics, which connects to other unsolved issues in physics, but there are many proposed solutions waiting to be verified. This distinction isn't perfect, as we have edgecases like measured quantum entanglement of particles that are kilometers apart, but its good enough approximation for most of usecases. We can technically use only relativistic quantum mechanics everywhere, but at other scales and speeds, relativistic quantum mechanics becomes mostly equivalent with just classical or relativistic mechanics, which is easier to work with. There is also generalized quantum theory paradigm for information processing by complex systems such as the brain, that takes into account contextual dependence of information and probabilistic reasoning, that can be mathematically described in the framework of quantum information and quantum probability theory, which is not reliant on the hypothesis that there is something micro-physical quantum-mechanical about the brain. Quantum field theory physics lies on shaky not really rigorous mathematical foundations [Quantum Field Theory: A Tourist Guide for Mathematicians](https://bookstore.ams.org/surv-149/) [Haag's theorem - Wikipedia]([Haag's theorem - Wikipedia]([Haag's theorem - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haag%27s_theorem))) , but there are several attempts to fix that. [quantum field theory in nLab]([quantum field theory in nLab]([quantum field theory in nLab]([quantum field theory in nLab]([quantum field theory in nLab]([quantum field theory in nLab]([quantum field theory in nLab](https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/quantum+field+theory))))))) [geometry of physics in nLab]([geometry of physics in nLab]([geometry of physics in nLab]([geometry of physics in nLab]([geometry of physics in nLab](https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/geometry+of+physics))))) ===Science -> Physics -> Mathematical foundations=== ===Science -> Physics -> Mathematical foundations -> Linear Algebra=== ===Science -> Physics -> Mathematical foundations -> Analysis=== ===Science -> Physics -> Mathematical foundations -> Symplectic geometry=== ===Science -> Physics -> Mathematical foundations -> Other=== ===Science -> Physics -> Systems theory=== ===Science -> Physics -> Systems theory -> Dynamical complex continuous systems theory=== ===Science -> Physics -> Systems theory -> Other=== ===Science -> Physics -> Classical -> Classical mechanics=== ===Science -> Physics -> Classical -> Classical mechanics -> Intuitive description=== Classical mechanics studies average sized objects moving at average speeds - speeds are much lower than the speed of light, sizes are much greater than that of atoms, yet very small in astronomical terms. ===Science -> Physics -> Classical -> Classical mechanics -> Mathematical description=== ===Science -> Physics -> Classical -> Classical mechanics -> Formulations=== ===Science -> Physics -> Classical -> Classical mechanics -> Formulations -> Newtonian mechanics=== ===Science -> Physics -> Classical -> Classical mechanics -> Formulations -> Newtonian mechanics -> Concepts -> Newton's law of universal gravitation=== ===Science -> Physics -> Classical -> Classical mechanics -> Formulations -> Newtonian mechanics -> Subfields -> Ḱinematics=== ===Science -> Physics -> Classical -> Classical mechanics -> Formulations -> Analytical mechanics=== ===Science -> Physics -> Classical -> Classical mechanics -> Formulations -> Analytical mechanics -> Lagrangian mechanics=== ===Science -> Physics -> Classical -> Classical mechanics -> Formulations -> Analytical mechanics -> Hamiltonian mechanics=== ===Science -> Physics -> Classical -> Classical mechanics -> Subdisciplines -> Harmonic analysis=== ===Science -> Physics -> Classical -> Classical field theory=== ===Science -> Physics -> Classical -> Classical field theory -> Subdisciplines -> Electromagnetism=== ===Science -> Physics -> Classical -> Classical field theory -> Subdisciplines -> Continuum mechanics=== ===Science -> Physics -> Classical -> Classical field theory -> Subdisciplines -> Continuum mechanics -> Fluid mechanics=== ===Science -> Physics -> Classical -> Classical field theory -> Subdisciplines -> Continuum mechanics -> Newtonian fluids=== ===Science -> Physics -> Classical -> Classical field theory -> Subdisciplines -> Continuum mechanics -> Non-newtonian fluids=== ===Science -> Physics -> Classical -> Statistical mechanics=== ===Science -> Physics -> Classical -> Statistical mechanics -> Thermodynamics=== ===Science -> Physics -> Classical -> Statistical mechanics -> Thermodynamics -> Nonequilibrium thermodynamics=== ===Science -> Physics -> Classical -> Statistical mechanics -> Ising model === ===Science -> Physics -> Classical -> Information theory=== ===Science -> Physics -> Classical -> Other=== ===Science -> Physics -> Relativistic=== Relativistic mechanics studies big objects moving at fast speed. ===Science -> Physics -> Relativistic -> Special relativity=== ===Science -> Physics -> Relativistic -> Special relativity -> Concepts -> Time dillation=== ===Science -> Physics -> Relativistic -> General relativity=== ===Science -> Physics -> Quantum=== ===Science -> Physics -> Quantum -> Quantum mechanics=== Quantum mechanics studies small objects moving at slow speeds. ===Science -> Physics -> Quantum -> Quantum mechanics -> Concepts -> Schrödinger equation=== ===Science -> Physics -> Quantum -> Quantum mechanics -> Concepts -> Uncertainty principle=== ===Science -> Physics -> Quantum -> Quantum mechanics -> Concepts -> Wave particle duality===