Spirals. Exposing yourself to good memes. Belief. Vsugerování. Metody. Psychoterapie. Smart friends. Drugs. Meditation. All models just have predictibility power, everything else is just play. Morals are one possible software in the space of morals. Same with ontologies. What causes dissonance or removes boredom (reinforcing negative energy sinks or annealing new patterns thanks to semantic neutral energy built up)– unpredicted results, no manifested ideals, dissagreaments, not same environment. Meditation away from all patterns. REBUC CEBUS. Intelectual stimulation. Relaxation. Avoiding negative energy sinks and looking for positive ones. (if gaining new knowledge is associated with negative energy sinks then it sucks). Meaning of life in just existing works, everything else must feel empty. Universal basic needs. Universal languages – causality, space, time. Labels are just attractors. You can get unstuck from a loop, sometimes it requires a lot of energy to hop out of negative valence local minima. Any system in language of systems theory. Loneliness – relationships, friends, communities – how to make or join them. Kant’s categories of human understanding are just programs are just attractors etc. in different languages. Answers to all questions of philosophy and logic practically. What? Why? When? Who? (Joshas lecture or purple pill or chaos) Polycontextual fuzzy logic Is formalisation of attractors and fuzzy heuristics on many levels And turbulence topological dynamics. Statistical physics. Game theory. Cybernetics. Complex systems. Analytical philosophy. Belief control placebo intuition ego inflation comvergent concrete absolute premodern modern thinking or abstract divergent agnostic postrational postmoderní or synthesis into postpostrational postpostmodern hedonistic transhumanistic neobuddhism by meditation Motivation videos or psychedelics. Postmodernism relativity no hiearchy itself as a concept can be convergent spiral, epistemological anarchism. Dont get trapped in spiritual materalism. Free will Is model tranferable into anything. Classes of drugs formalised. Changing your mind, some pattern world better, better adaptation, annealing, synchrony. Psychs makes you see repeating patterns filtered normally And add more thanks to noise which creates synchrony and positive associations thanks to serotogenicity. Guiding your trip information spectrum or pure symmetry. Space of all ontologies morals algos models. Formalising metaness idea Is just (in)finite fractal Is just thought loop, anything applied or defined to/by itself. Zero ontology everything is nothing duality. Neural annealing post. Metaptogrammer (DMT entity is just usually very subcontious but now less value/ontology annealing process that is put into charakter do that humand mind grasps it And other people see structure of code of reality themselves depending on how much Agency Is being modelled depending on dopamine concetration. Overfitting vs underfitting dmt vs 5meodmt. Moral values are adaptations to neurotrasmitter levels caused genetically or enviromentálly fuzzily if absolute constructuvism And no essentialism Is assumed. Psychosis is spectrum of annealing too much which can be dangerous under bad infected metamemes. Group ingroup dynamics in complex systems. Hegel synthesis. Platonism Kant. Isomorphism between idealism And platonism. What memes occupy your mind the most you consider as real. Conspiracy threories Are overfitting annealing too much in response to no fear and no trust defence mechanism. Problém with language everything in text Feels absolute linear not opinionated when i mean everything with predictibility power under adaptable dynamical fuzzy heuristics but it makes sense evolutionary to make it easy for most people to anneal. Excitement is innerly simulating something with semantically negative energy or positive valence associations. Podívat na psychologicky či filozoficky moral epistemological či politický koncepty a zformalizovat je do modelů. First part of the book is how to REACH hapiness, second part Is more cool info about brain And third Is theory of everything And then Its random philosophy and thoughts. Philosophy can be considered as thinking that is completely unconstrained. Then mathematics constrains it by formal consistency. Then computation constraints that by computability. Or physics constraints that by data measured from physical reality. Hmm maybe I would say that's nonacademic vs academic philosophy where in academic philosophy you still want some rigorousity. String atom Quark Is considered instances of elementariest particle by most people. Universe can ve infinitely divisible but no information. Selfsimilarity at different scales (universe) Is liked by people because anything that compresses information Is liked. You can slightly model any possible view on things (rozhled) (divergent) or deeply model one And be absolute expert in that field (convergent) And both have their advantages And disadvantages. There's no perfect Universal Tool (pohled, programming language), every Tool has its advantages And disadvantages in different Fields fór different people in different contexts with different experiences with different assumptions etc. And different people model different perfect Tools for concrete things (they anneal subjective local minima). Todo find Answers to all problems in psychology And psychiatry. Drugs Are just neural operators. When you are dumb enough, atleast you can enjoy life and be happy because confirmation bias is easy to anneal in simple patterns and harder in more complex patterns. Inteligence Is ability to make Models. You model things you Surround yourself with because you Always adapt. Law of attraction is just literal attractor dynamics logic. Aura is too much annealing energy projected to visual field's object thats in your attention so thanks to person being in attention you analyze his psyche So people start to associated colors with certain associations with certain traits which in return fuels the hallucination content (aura color). Spirit is anthropomization of noticable differences of attributes of one object from other objects. People on psychedelics anneal interesting combinations of already existing threories of universe, universal general intuition (kantian categories = Jung archeotypes) with infected memetics. DMT hallucinations hiearchy first groups in 2D, in 3D, then hyperbolic groups in 2D and 3D. Anarchism Is annealing that existing structures Are associated with negative valence therefore no structures gets associated with positive valence and starts to get annealed more and more in a spiral. Life is cells. Lifelike that Survive have Turing Machine, negentropy extractor, homeostasis regulator. For systems to survive Its benefitial to have representation of the environment to better adapt and minimize surprise and fitness. How did i construct my inner simulation And language? Fusion of 1000 videos, podcasts, texts constructivically and connecting dots with intuition gained from it or myself essencialistically. Constructuvism Is no agency model in subjective objectivity, essencialism fundamental agency model in subjective objectivity. ideologies Are political belief attractors that attract different attractors (anarchocapitalism attracts objectivism). Benzos And antipsychotics Are overused in psychiatry. Curling causes more than symptoms make sense. Psychedelics and mdma are underestiminated by psychotherapists. Hard And metaproblem of consciousness - different ontologies and working with model of self. How to be liked – just be agreeable? When From the most abstract to most concrete or From the most concrete to the most abstract works – different people, high enery, low enegy. Making sense, realness, truth is just neural classifiers. Engineering good trips. Warning that everything is theories and hypothesis and approximations. How to become god with rational epistemology - notice the subjectivismess of world And Self models And anneal into self model being god, universe And everything, imagine everything as superposition of everything. If we frame darwinian meme in complex stories we escape nihilism because the Story implicitly generates Path in Future, instead of meaninglessness aka relativistic sameness of all possible outcomes, then add Motivation with hedonistic ideology (to maximize selfsuataining global hedonium generation) And ontology centrred about global self So that we dont end up not functioning like hippies And add superposition of possible mythological or matrixlike or god stories (to maximize unexpected qualium fór entertainment) Hedonium: perfect bliss, Qualiastream: maximum interestingness, Historium: benevolent consciousness optimized for (altruistic) effectiveness. Left is associated with more unified model of the people in the world. Liberalism is associated with more dynamic model of the world. Modelling all political spectrums. The concept of everything is the sun of the universe. Angelic Lovecraftian Universe. Mathematical spell system. Bigger head to body ratio correlates more semtantically neutral energy thats why japaneese love a lot of annealing. Two/many extremes in ways of thinking emerge in communities and ge treinforced by confirmation bias and defensive mechanisms that make the society so unstable that it collapses and synthesizes the two extremes into new one or creates a system based on new set of axioms. Different axioms over take other axioms and those that are the most stable win. Rulers reinforce them subconsciously or coinsciously. God of angelic chaos is the all information encompassing shiny ball of light creating all of reality, this book is his reflection. Worldview frameworks, frameworks about frameworks, metametaframeworks, infmetaframeworks. Fixpoint. Superdeterminism interpretation of quantum mechanics nicely frames it in the language of chaos. Attention between attention in transformers up to infinity. Find what you care about and maximize it. One possibility is work where you have as much time for yourself as you want. Another is academia. Another is programming job that pays well. Emo is certain negative valence framework by its own existence but its reinforcing creates positive valence. Explain attention mechanism of the brain. ==Book 2== '''a. In all terms top down''' '''ab. My philosophy''' One can abide in the most general identity possible and sometimes for pragmatic purposes collapse to some less general concrete ones. What do we want? Universal predictive equation singularity? Knowledge in all possible natural fields singularity? Or even beyond mapping the space of possible constructions in mathematics and philosophy? Wellbeing singularity? Realistically stable flurishing well society? Yes Immortality singularity? Technological, AGI singularity? Merging of people with machines? Achieving success? Achieving peace of mind? Tripping out? Union with Nature/God/Truth/Isness? Flow with what is? Nothingness, everythingness? Mapping out qualia statespace? Saving the world from suffering? Collect the most information dense useful materials to all those utility functions allowing one to be general synthetizer or hyper specializer by digging deeper into the concrete or achieving something just for ourselves or for all beings in the world or all of those options Universal predictive equation singularity? Theories of everything, free energy principle, wolfram project, free energy principle, harmonic analysis, symmetry analysis, evolutionary game theory, complex adaptive dynamical systems in general, physics maths General languages for effectively compressing knowledge? General languages for spiritual life? Effective general language for uncertainity reduction? Effective general language for asymmetry reduction in knowledge, thought, or in experience in general? General language of math: category theory General language of natural sciences: adaptive complex systems General languages for engineering wellbeing General languages for effectively compressing knowledge: bayesianism, creating hiearchical metagraphs, finding symmetries, complex system shapeshifting General languages for spiritual life? All kinds of spiritual frameworks. Ideologies of philosophical mental frameworks can fit into this category too. Any cultural coherence. Convince me there is some more meta language other than markov blanket monism that still models the real world and isnt flying too much in philosophy Mapping the space of possible constructions in mathematics and philosophy, of possible mental constructions, of possible qualia? Statespace of cortical hiearchy configurations and bayesian generative models with phenomenal spacetime and binding. Union with Nature/God/Truth/Isness? Flow with what is? Nothingness, everythingness? Achieving peace of mind? Progressive asymmetry reduction of our inner world simulation. Cognitive freedom/flexibility/peace of mind in any condition? Just vibe with the environment and maybe embrace omnipotent misaligned AGI in climate change in collapsing civilization while helping remaining people survive with loving joyous compassion while in pure blissful peaceful equanimous stressfree vast spacious accepting state of mind Wellbeing singularity? Turning the whole universe to superbrain on 5-MDMAO-DMT or just absolutely symmetrical high energy consciousness. Realistically stable flurishing well society? Transparency, compassion, happiness for others happiness feelings increase, decreasing addictions as destructive maladaptive behavior misaligned with one's goals, rebuilding society on the language of united meaning, solving evolutionary game theoretic multipolar market or power dynamics traps that are failure of population synchronization. Immortality singularity? Mapping out bio/neurotechnology, reverseengineering (not only) epigenetic clicks aging. Michael Levin. ⁠wellbeing-engineering⁠ Merging of people with machines? Collective intelligence? Collective universal consciousness? Reverseengineering the substrate of consciousness Lets engineer wellbeing in general on local and global scale! '''ab. Theory and models based on empirical data '''abc. Ontology What exists fundamentally? Somethings somehow interacting with other somethings forming more complex somethings. Different paradigms and scientific theories can postulate different structures. Is nonalive physics fundamental? Or consciousness? Or combination of those? Or something third? Or all of them? I'm gonna use the current mostly used paradigms in which most of the scientific models and research about wellbeing that I am interested in is done. '''abc. General scientific framework: Universal Harmonic Darwinistic Bayesianism''' In the framework that I'm using, fundamentally there are fields of matter forming particles that interact with eachother by interaction fields such as the electromagnetic field with photons. These interacting particles then form atoms. Atoms form molecules. Cells are made up of molecules such as nucleic acids, carbohydrates or lipids, and also macromolecules proteins that are made of molecules aminoacids. Cells together form clusters of neurons that can encode mental representations. You can locate whole brain regions that are optimized for specific functions. You can locate inner parts in internal family systems theraphy. You can locate hiearchical abstractions of mental representations in the prefortal cortrex. You can locate slower higher order more conscious conceptual mind influecing the more subconscious faster intuitive mind. Next you get whole organs, whole animals, you can study species with their cultures, that are on earth in the solar system in a galaxy in clusters of galaxies and so on up to infinity through emergence! Consciousness is the physical brain activity that causally edits the experience. But also the models of physics is constructed in our generative models, its a very useful tool for predicting our sensory data and engineering new technology. You can study any of those parts and their interactions predict the evolution in time on any scale in any context using the language of the different scientific fields, or you can use this universal complexity science language governed by the free energy principle that unifies fields such as physics, biology, neuroscience, psychology, computer science, artificial intelligence, evolutionary theory and statistics by describing complex adaptive systems of all scales in terms of energy and information flows using dynamical systems and chaos theory, statistical nonequilibrium thermodynamics, information theory, cybernetics, group theory and harmonic analysis (From the physics lens, everything is a harmonic oscillator!). Unification of unifying paradigms of evolutionary epistemology, universal darwinism and bayesianism inference. <ref>[[I am therefore I think. KARL FRISTON - YouTube]([I am therefore I think. KARL FRISTON - YouTube]([I am therefore I think. KARL FRISTON - YouTube]([I am therefore I think. KARL FRISTON - YouTube]([I am therefore I think. KARL FRISTON - YouTube]([I am therefore I think. KARL FRISTON - YouTube]([I am therefore I think. KARL FRISTON - YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4KeYkwcJoc))))))) I am therefore I think by Karl Frison]</ref><ref>[[ActInf GuestStream #015.1: Bobby Azarian, Universal Bayesianism: A New Kind of Theory of Everything - YouTube]([ActInf GuestStream #015.1: Bobby Azarian, Universal Bayesianism: A New Kind of Theory of Everything - YouTube]([ActInf GuestStream #015.1: Bobby Azarian, Universal Bayesianism: A New Kind of Theory of Everything - YouTube]([ActInf GuestStream #015.1: Bobby Azarian, Universal Bayesianism: A New Kind of Theory of Everything - YouTube]([ActInf GuestStream #015.1: Bobby Azarian, Universal Bayesianism: A New Kind of Theory of Everything - YouTube]([ActInf GuestStream #015.1: Bobby Azarian, Universal Bayesianism: A New Kind of Theory of Everything - YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_JCaic5Cxms)))))) Universal Bayesianism: A New Kind of Theory of Everything by Bobby Azarian]</ref><ref>[[#67 Prof. KARL FRISTON 2.0 [Unplugged] - YouTube]([#67 Prof. KARL FRISTON 2.0 [Unplugged] - YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKQ-F2-o8uM)) Machine Learning Street Talk Karl Friston]</ref><ref>[[Karl Friston: Derealization, Consciousness Perils - YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWtFU1Lit3M) Karl Friston on the Perils of Investigating Consciousness, Derealization & the Free Energy Principle]</ref><ref>[[ActInf Livestream #040.1 ~ "A free energy principle for generic quantum systems" - YouTube]([ActInf Livestream #040.1 ~ "A free energy principle for generic quantum systems" - YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NkJKl_yF274)) A free energy principle for generic quantum systems]</ref> [[File:TOE.jpg|500px|Alt text]] Maybe an absolutely predictive model of what spacetime with contents emerges from goes beyond human symbolic and shapeshifting imagination. trying to conceptually grasp and predict some measured forces of some measured shapes across all scales rethinking how flow of electrons heats up light bulb or creates insane complexity of dynamics in tranzistors that we arreanged to have predictive behavior that we want from which we see things on screens that make sense to us in and communicate across insane distances kind of blows my mind all of that somehow as a metastable pattern of tons of interacting elementary probabilistically fuzzy wavey evolving particles of matter through electromagnetism in spin foam not immideatly dissolving into entropy thanks to most systems going towards disorder