Psychedelics create big amounts of motivated semantically neutral energy which in return creates a lot of annealing processes, that can reinforce, relax, replace existing beliefs, depending on your current metameme structure. The stronger metameme you have, the less likely you will relax it and you’ll supercharge it instead. DMT tends to make you abstractly overfit your ontology metamemeplexes and put it all in a beautiful extremely complex interconnected story about you, universe and so on. 5-MeO-DMT tends to make you underfit instead and relaxes all possible structure into one global positive valence attractor in which you see the concept of everything. Stimulants reinforce concrete overfitting, which is why they’re so good for concrete learning. Substance, set, setting and dose dictates on what metalevel of memeplexes you fly in in which modalities, closer or more far away from concerete modelling of the universal basic needs. Better state This also applies without any substances. Set and setting dictates on what memeplexes you inhibit your model of reality in. Neurobiology itself dictates the space of all possible mind states. It’s not constant. It’s dynamic. It changes with new memeplexes and with different substances that come from classical food aswell. Neuroprotective foods also make the selforganizing mechanisms and everything more healthy too. Someone being open to everything is having a metamemeplex which every other memeplex can be in. Different people put different restrictions to this metamemeplex. I am open in the space of all possible memeplexes. Big subset of scientists are mostly open on the level of memeplexes having predictive power. Spiritual people are open on those maximizing positive valence. Certain ideologies create a different subspace of all memeplexes too. Anarchism tends towards memeplexes destroying hiearchy. Authoritianism towards domination. Personality traits can emerge from all those memeplexes or they fuel other memeplexes. They create emergence or collapse into meta ones. Some of them specialize better than others. Some of them are more dynamical than others. Some of them are more motivating. Happy reality In some sense your whole reality is one giant approximation. The sense of self, environment, objects, truths, time and space can be warped using different mind configurations in many ways. If one wants to engineer an optimal solution to life, he has to consier all possible factors. If one already has this infinitemetamemeplex that relativizes everything, it can make one feel empty. That’s why when consuming predictive metamemeplexes, it’s great to consume ones framed in positive valence story framework, it’s also great to consume ones that have as much reinforced inner structure to coorporate with others as possible, the ones that have community around them, the ones that yield pragmatic ways of implementing those positive valence experiences in group, because without group, an individual can implement only so much and is limited to only his knowledne and his mind and is not satifying the need for belonging because we’re optimized for socializing. My ideal community This can be many frameworks, one such that seems to be the most optimal for people with high annealing parameter given by nature and nurture is this one. Exploring the realms of analyzing the mind and the world is exploring the god’s, nature’s simulation’s creator’s or whatever’s inner approximated structure. We’re in some sense all that thing. One unified thing, because reality isnt just sum of its parts. Things depend on eachother, there’s some kind of connection between anything, said mathematically in the language of fractals for example. Without any part of it the reality wouldn’t work. Everyone is part of everything. Let’s collaborate on engineering the paradise through the lens of both rationality and spirituality in this complex system we call nature. Let’s eliminate the negative extremes through the means of memetics and all other possible neurotechnology. Let’s reinforce patterns in behavior that are linked to better physical and mental health, such as meditation, healthy food, exercise or social gathering. Let’s socially conduct all possible acitivities and technologies linked to raising the energy levels of the brain and therefore making our nervous systems healthy. Let’s cooperate on building those technologies or belief systems. Let’s analyze things not only in short term means, but also in long term means. For example let’s accumulate pleasure through the whole day through reinforcing behaviours which empirically yield better mental wellbeing in the long term. Let’s create technology based on predictive power models. Let’s create interesting stories about the world around us by maximing interstingness. Let’s use the power of feedback loop to design a better world. Let’s model the past and future as positive valence progress, where we learn from mistakes and sharpen our models. Let’s reinforce not getting stuck into negative valence attractors. Let’s maximize not forced productivity. For everyone This is one possible path. If one cannot anneal into motivated productive state for paradise engineering, one can be the one who gets help from the engineers without needing to help back in the realm of engineering, just as not everyone is a doctor. Let’s engineer memeplexes specialized for certain people in theraphy. Let’s use the power of neurotechnology like substances to help those people anneal more positive valence generating aligned memeplexes, just like tribal cultures were doing it. Let’s tolerate the existence of other possible maximizing paradigms in our world such as postulating that suffering is fundamental and let those be if they dont want to get aligned. Let’s tolerate all other possible systems when it doesnt directly negatively affect us, like wanting to overtake and dominate us with different maximalization algorithms. Let’s have those metaprocess in our brain: one attracting us to social groups with as many compabilities to us as possible to motivationaly work together on the same goal, second one relativizing all possible states of mind so that empirical analyzation and modelling is possible, third one putting everything into philosophical framework stories making it easier to anneal, where states of mind are possible manifestations emerging from this everything encompassing nature divine laws and having some approximations of attractors that cause the emergence of positive valence states of mind and manifest and engineer those methods in us. This is for people that are optimised for communities. I would label the community under this framework as transhumanistic hedonistic neobuddhistic hippies. Effective altruists are pretty close to this. If one wants to work individually instead of on the level of a community, he can anneal all of those values on an individual level as contents of his self model. But the more individual one makes it, the more lonely he can feel. Interconnectedness of the self model to the model of the environment satisfies the need for belonging. But if one anneals his interconnectedness to nature by treating nature on the same level as other people, so modelling it like modelling interconnectedness to other people, this need can be satisfied while being individual. The metamemeplex I’m telling has people as part of nature, as its manifestation. Or both at the same time is great too. But the more brain is specialised, the better it anneals in that domain, the more it lives through the concrete experiences. If brain is specialised on the most general level, then it lives reality mostly through those lens. Both work and yield positive valence experiences when framed in positive valence optimized framework. Living in noise without any framing is not good for the nervous system. Generalised chaos This might not be end goal, there is probably more to all of this, let’s ascend to more universes, maybe there are more ways to abstract over all existing ways of thinking and then all those could maybe be abstracted futher without overfitting or underfitting. But as Kant said, it’s still most likely plays in our sensory information processing hardware and software and there’s isnt an information processing hardware such that all complexities of the reality could be compressed in. Maybe for each possible hardwirable compression way aka categories of intuition you could create a model in some extremely unified category. When the evolution of the chaos modelling paradigm itself can be modelled by itself, let’s take the space of all possible modelling paradigms. If me as a prediction machine wanting the most positive valence for itself and other beings, wanting stability and cooperation so that those positive valence methods of designing belief systems or creating pragmatic empiric methods from models of the brain can flourish, wanting the most interesting exepriences full of the most interesting complexity. If we try to apply this under the classical framework from which we model physics combined with from what thoughts Lovecraft or Wittgenstein was coming from. We have this ungraspable concept of something, let it be under certain approximations some liquid, mathematics, nature, universe, chaos, concept of unknown, subtrate, code, simulation, creator, god, gods, angel, Cthulu, everything, anything, something, superposition of all of those concepts. And we try to approximate over it with all possible thought conctructions that our minds are capable of thanks to their in some ways shared structure. We anneal the patterns so nicely into our neural classifiers that we believe it’s existence constituents for the existence of our inner and outer world, and even this classification of the inner and outer can break down with meditation for example. All barries can break down and create pure unification of everything in one. My most functioning approximation of this mind state is an abstract algebraic structure without any restrictions applied to it, a blank canvas. Even in physics, we say that theory of relativity creates the canvas, the spacetime in which anything can exist, and quantum mechanics draws on that canvas with particles encoded as wave functions, nice waves of paint. Quantum field theory then picks out each paint color and structure into it’s own canvases from which the final canvas is merged into. This concept of unknown is something that creates us and itself, because we are it and it is us. A drawing that creates and paints itself. Shape of dynamics Maybe this kind of structure is what is emerging when we do pure statistics over data without any human-like structure in neural networks? We just need to find the right language for approximating its dynamics, maybe nonlinear polycontextual fuzzy logic, just like how brain does bayesian inference? Can they in theory learn any possible dynamics, or they fundamentally specialise only in some modality space of attractors and everything wont emerge even when trained optimally infinitely? When we jump from neural networks to less general methods in data science, when we try to find common patterns among some data, we can do factor analysis using linear regression and principal component analysis. Big five model of personalities is pretty good dimension reduction when it comes to personalities, those are also attractors. It could be reduced to just two. It could be reduced to way more many. The more spectrums we add, the more complexity we get. Again, we can overfit or underfit. We add more structure, like subspectrums or any hiearchical set or category theoretic model hiearchy. We can specialize in different modalities. Data can be noneuclidian, not normally distributed, logaritmic. Fuzzy polycontextual logic All of this can be encoded in the shapes and sizes and attractor relations between different attractors in a similar way like infinity category theory does it in deterministic way, this can be in polycontextual fuzzy way. Can nonlinear polycontextual fuzzy logic be the most general approximation of pure topological attractor dynamics? In neural network architectures, multiple layers of attention mechanisms, similar to human attention in layers of modalities, are used, where every layer picks up some combination of some patterns. Attention between attentions, multiple layers of attention on top of attention layers would be metaattention. Just like humans create attention on top of attention. Or neural networks on top of neural networks. Let’s formalise bayesian inference. Story about the god of chaotic abstraction wantering the space of all existences Dissecting an abstract optimizing compatibility with environment nihilistic song into healthy optimistic framework How to get everyone to like you Step one Be agreeable When anyone says anything Nod your head Doesn't even matter what they said Just show 'em what they wanna see "Wow, I agree with everything you just said" "Wow, this guy's alright!" "Cool." Repeat until dead This is easy. It has many disadvantages at first rhough. You still have some individual worldviews and the incompatible memeplexes with your annealed selforganized structure that others shoot at your senses cause physical pain. This disadvantage dissapears when you ultimately generalize your worldview. Step two Never voice a complaint Because we all know that opinions are tainted This is the crucial part of building a constantly activated metaprocess attractor eating all sensory data connected to the positive valence centers in the brain. When under indirect realistic brains as information processing entities you see how every single world model is just a useful approximation of sensory data directed towards subjective values of universal basic needs, you notice how every person annealed to a different approximation and it makes sense that they did, since it converged into the space that is most compatible with their inner pressures in most cases. Some people’s inner pressures are too chaotic or inconsistent to abstract over concretely. But if through meditation or substances or other methods you symmetrify and generalize those pressures in a positive valence way start to see positive value in buddha vector that eighter does not get attracted to anything but itself or is from a third point of view is looking over any attarctors that te mind converges in and optimizes the mind in such a way that it directs it mostly to attractors connected to positive valence and need for belonging through interconnectedness and unity, you can see this relativity of every possible world model in a nonnihhilistic way, in happy optimistic way, and generate motivation by making part of your meaning of life spreading this positive metamemeplex. Everyone ever canonized as a saint Was historically neutral on the topic of Satan Step three Avoid hills Hills are filled with the skeletons of those that died in them Don't be a skeleton Don't be anything at all! If you never stand then you can Never fall and it's just so So comfortable Be agreeable Step four When someone says something that you hate Take a deep breath push it deep down Turn that frown upside-down and you'll feel great One quick trick psychologists hate! Your framework's made of silly putty You'll let yourself be shaped An agreea-playdough-ble Rolled into something that you hate If you build your metaprocess in such a way that you hate nothing, but everything has nonzero positive valence aspect to it when summed up itself, then hatred always gets canceled by this stronger process in the brain. So How do you feel now about you? 5/10 or more 2? Fear of 0 kept you from The 10/10, a 10/10 But congratulations Everyone likes you again! But you're neutral on the topic of you, cause No one will ever love you No one will ever hate you Or you can transpose this in such a way that everyone will always love and hate you, but hating itself can be considered as a negative valence form of love, therefore everyone is just falling in love with you in different forms. But its better to just optimize the love itself and connect every phenomena in the world to positive valence expression of love to your and our eternal self. Goal is to find this experience in yoruself and as many others as possible that want to. The more one wants the easier it is for the other one, so trying in those people is the most cost effective from effective altruist optimization point of view. Till you're at the pearly gates But heaven's too good for you But you're not even bad enough for hell So purgatory's where you'll dwell Because you were agreeable Redirectness to heaven realms works. This text feels more negative than neutral. Pure neutrality would in my opinion be my text without the positive valence parts. It’s really unstable because it converges into no basic needs being met, so one has to constantly balance stuff if he wants pure neutrality of mind in practice. This is for the subjective heaven/hell realms connected to the valence of self experience. Christian objective realms are structured in such a way that they dont care if you had negative valence experience of mind, only your output matters, in there, mine nad this song’s structure would be both forms of pure neutrality, if you didnt subsribe on motivating yourself to making other’s experiences also positive valence ones, yeah. Also, purgatory sounds like a neverending trip. :D Be a, be agreeable Be a, be agreeable Be a, be agreeable Pure thoughts Theory of everything The world explained in the language of the chaos Generalizing neural annealing to everything From the most abstract to most concrete. From the most concrete to the most abstract. Brain theory Bad local minima caused by bad annealed patterns caused by bad inner world or/and environment so far or too broken nervous system? Neural Annealing. Creating patterns. Adaptation. Positive and negative valence. Energy sinks. Reach happiness and eliminate sadness in brain Relax procrastination patterns. Supercharge motivation generators. Keep good neurotransmitters. Meditation, food, exercise, placebo. Ideals. Semantically free energy. Society Knowledge in general Everything is approximation. Everyone speaks their own language of the same language Drugs formalised