"Music and dance are the extravagant exuberance of a nervous system just overflowing with a propensity to oscillate in dynamic symmetrical and periodic patterns in hierarchical orders of complexity."<ref>[https://twitter.com/Deepfryguy76/status/1650704690827362304 Music in Harmonic Gestalt, Steven Lehar, 2021]</ref>
==Personal message to everyone==
I started with early complex post traumatic stress disorder from dissonant social experiences, sensory overload, hyperanalysis, overfitting, attentional issues, hyperactivity, empathic emotional deficit, impulsive addictive behavior, anxious-like qualities combo dissonantly interacting with the environment in selfreinforcing feedback loop way that works differently than my organism in this sense combined with first bad trip thanks to unprepared set and setting and spiraling into dissonance, all of which lead to tons of hebbian canalizations over my whole brain as a response to threatening adversity while studying everything from neuroscience to philosophy an attempt to help myself as I was all over the place with milions of perspectives interacting in the space of the mind mine not really unified. But also out of neverending curiousity!
Then by studying unifying metatheories and doing nondual attentional relaxing meditative psychedelic deconstructive and lovingly unifying constructive activities I increased tempature mediated metametaframeworkian plasticity that allowed my organism to interconnect and merge all the canals into one giant metametatheoretic structure that I'm writing in my book, merging all my disconnected subagents or wavey cloudy raw sensations or mentally constructed linguistic or mental models and simulations in general inside into one empty but full interconnected field that is calmed and stable by swimming in loving caring childlike light cute playful deep vast compassionate still spacious free groundless ground that is beyond language, concepts or abstract thought where all beings are spacetimelessly one in the womb of awareness creation that is putting my subagents in unified cooperative harmony and feels divinely comforting where I can be or do "normal human things" or write about all of this without attention everywhere and other things in peace if something way too destabilizing hasnt happened that day. ❤️
There is definitely still more potential to engineer and train the skill to feel unification, learning to love and accept what is, be equaminous in way more external and internal conditions than now, dissolve or transform more learned dissonant conditioned reactions, its still an unfolding healing and overall improvement process, nobody is ever flawless and selfimprovement and wellbeing engineering technically has no upper bound!
Plus I wanna also help everyone with mental discomfort and smoothen, fill the spiky dissonant dark void made of subagents with fullfillment, selfactualization and light, give it breadcrumbs of love and understanding, using these tools I've researched into as effectively as possible, so that's why I'm looking into how can all of this be effectively applied at scale and globally heal and increase the total wellbeing of population and evolve together, effectively mitigate existencial risks, go towards consciousness wellbeing utopia full of mutual compatibility and smooth frictionless coordination, full of freedom for everyone, together as unified humanity or life in general! Let's be healthy, happy, creative, productive, loving together in the quest of making our inner and outer world a better place! 💖
[[File:love3.gif|1000px|Alt text]]
=Oldest version of the book=
==Summary==
In this book which is my Magnum Opus I:
- Lay out nonreductive theory of everything based on quantum field theory and the free energy principle and interconnect it with various mathematical methodologies, approaches and fields, such as harmonic analysis
- I put express various relatedness and isomorphisms between various neurophenomenological (the study of the brain and interconnecting it with the experience) models (brain network model, predictive processing, connectome harmonics, topology) and unify them into one model
- I explain how wellbeing, happiness, meditation, psychedelics, mental discomfort, philosophy, pleasure, enlightenment is understood using this framework (reducing uncertainity by consonant symmetrical activity)
- Go over the existing "what is fundamental" ontological discussions inside and outside of academia (physics, consciousness, unification of those, something third, transcedence of this way of thinking - only prepdictivity of models matters)
- Based on this research, I give suggestions on how to solve the metacrisis (statistical physics flavoured evolutionary game theory to global social system to navigate the interconnected landscape of existencial risks for humanity in order to find evolutionary stable strategic longterm solutions of not selfdecostructing ourselves soon with stuff like nuclear war, climate change or bio/cyberweapons because of caring for individual short term safety instead of global long term safety) and the meaning crisis by social systems optimized for happiness (slowly transforming the system in better conditions for coordination by for example bigger transparency and for wellbeing by for example denormalizing chronic stress and normalizing cleaning the mind, normalizing states of consciousness high in wellbeing such as Jhanas or 5-MeO-DMT), implications for artificial general intelligence and alignment (inspiration on how people synchronize their vibes from neuroscience)
- Based on this research, I lay out a full stack protocol on engineering wellbeing using deconstructive and constructive meditation, psychedelics and ways of thinking (equaminity, nonduality, love, perfectness, cultivating symmetrification of neurophenomenology), how to heal trauma and align DMT entities
- Based on this way of thinking, I suggest definitions for certain philosophical constructs such as truth (certain configurations of sensations or of the brain dynamics), and how to liberate the thinking mind with philosophy (transcendence of all concepts by middle waying everything)
==Table of contents==
'''a. In all terms top down'''
'''ab. My philosophy'''
'''ab. Theory and models based on empirical data
'''abc. Ontology
'''abc. General scientific framework: Universal Harmonic Darwinistic Bayesianism'''
'''abc. Models of brain'''
'''abcd. Brain networks models of mental phenomena'''
'''abcd. Connectome harmonics using biochemical brain activity via electromagnetic field and its topology and symmetries'''
'''abcd. Neural Annealing'''
'''abc. Concrete mental phenomena and tools'''
'''abcd. Wellbeing, happiness, pleasure, enlightenment'''
'''abcd. Meditation'''
'''abcde. Emptiness as mental constructedness'''
'''abcd. Total mental frameworks and identities: philosophies, ontologies, ideologies, religions,...'''
'''abcd. Substances'''
'''abcde. Stimulants'''
'''abcde. Dissociatives'''
'''abcde. Alcohol'''
'''abcde. Weed'''
'''abcde. Antidepressives'''
'''abcde. Psychedelics'''
'''abcd. DMT entities and Gods'''
'''abcd. Meaning'''
'''abcd. Neurodivergences'''
'''abcde. Definition'''
'''abcde. Depression'''
'''abcdef. BN'''
'''abcdef. FEP'''
'''abcdef. CHEMTSCHB'''
'''abcdef. All'''
'''abcde. Anxiety'''
'''abcde. ADHD'''
'''abcde. Autism'''
'''abcde. Schizophrenia'''
'''abcde. Trauma and PTSD'''
'''abcd. Lucid dreaming'''
'''abc. Unified model of all and neurophenomenology'''
'''ab. Practical applications of this research
'''abc. Fullstack Protocol for Engineering Wellbeing: Meditation, psychedelics, thinking'''
'''abcd. Basic needs and health'''
'''abcd. Meditation session'''
'''abcde. Mental moves'''
'''abcdef. Intention'''
'''abcdef. Relaxing'''
'''abcdef. Gladening the mind'''
'''abcdef. Building packets of negentropy'''
'''abcdef. Seven factors of awakening'''
'''abcdef. Deconstruction'''
'''abcdef. Resting by doing nothing'''
'''abcdef. Center of awareness jumping out of your head/neck/heart/gut into vast space'''
'''abcdef. Jhanas as slowly lowering the information content of experience'''
'''abcdef. Seven factors of awakening'''
'''abcdef. Solving trauma by healing the exile in loving nondual awareness'''
'''abcdef. Changing one's mind aka construction'''
'''abcde. Substances'''
'''abcdef. DMT entity alignment'''
'''abcde. Message and sex'''
'''abcde. Audio'''
'''abcde. Visual'''
'''abc. Solving the Meta Crisis with the Meaning Crisis by Social System Optimized for Transparency and Happiness'''
'''ab. Philosophy and other things
'''abc. Mental constructions'''
'''abcd. Truth'''
'''a. In all terms bottom up'''
==Book 1==
Explanation of everything with the language of chaos including how to be happy. Guide to life. Neural Annealing Model in Practice. Optimal Cybernetic Architecture of Parameters and Algorithms. Explanation of Yourself in Existence. Answer to Life. Hapiness in the Language of Chaos. Neobuddhistic Teaching.
from Burny
from a person trying his best to understand the world
from qualia research institute community member
from a machine reverseengineering itself
from the point of view of postpostmodernistic transhumanistic hedonistic constructivistic analytical neobuddhist using rational epistemology
from fellow soul seeking truth and happiness wanting to help others do the same
from one mind attractor
from neobuddhist
for Burny +- epsilon
for other people
for scientists
for other machines
for philosophers
for other spiritual beings
for other mind attractors
for buddhists
What types of labelling systematizing systems leads to heaven realm states of mind and how to paradise engineer it’s emergence and how to engineer the emergence of the engineering itself and so on? Do you want these things? Not being lost in life. Knowing what you’re doing. Being happy with your life. Making people you care about happy. Not feel lonely. Feel accepted. Feel peace. Understand the world and others. Enjoy doing stuff. Not be lazy. Be motivated. Have energy. Be the best person. Let’s find out how to achieve that. What practical implications does neural annealing model have for mental wellbeing? What are the best algorithms to maximize the most optimal parameters in the space of mental wellbeing in time? What does interpreting empiric data under direct realism and qualia constructivism philosophical framework tell us about achieving states of mind close to platonic hedonistic states of mind? How to find truth, hapiness, peace for our soul manifesting itself in the physical world? In the space of all attractors existing now, what factor attractors fuel the best mental wellbeing mind attractors? How to get to enlightenement? |
In order to understand how things work, let’s first figure out how our brains understand anything in the first place.
So, what do we find ourselves in? We suddenly popped into existence with a body that we can control and there are things around us happening everyday and we make sense of it and try to find what’s the best for us with our limited energy. Something is bad? Avoid it. Something is good? Keep looking for it. How do we see if something is good or bad, how do we know that it works? Experience, intuition, someone telling us and convincing us. What things do we want to do? Good things we know that work or new stuff that isnt repetetive. This is crucial. Being happy works? Let’s continue. Being sad works? Let’s continue. Being optimistic works? Let’s continue. Being pessimistic works? Let’s continue. We know this idea works? Let’s try to realise it!
We’re supposted to do what? What’s the purpose of it all? Is there even something like a purpose? Is there meaning of life? Or how do our brains create meaning in life?
I make a lot of claims in this book. Some of them are hypothesis extensions from empirical data based models that might or might not correspond to empiric data if the prediction would be put to an experiment. Or it’s neutral play.
Everything and nothing
So, what is the most abstract and general thing? The theory of everything? In order to explain everything you need to explain nothing. In the most general structure, everything can be true.
For example absolute nonexistence of experiences, illusionism, or absolute epistemological agnocisism, antirealism, say that nothing is fundamentally true or real, which itself is true or real.
This is amazing philosophically, because you can gain understanding of any thought construct thanks to being able to anneal into any possible structure.
Thinking
If we switch to more pragmatism, what is the only thing we can directly measure? There is some experience. And some contents of experience. Different modalities of experience. Thoughts themselves live in this space, also also philosophical thoughts. Let’s break down different kinds of thought modalities. There’s pure unconstrained thinking. Then there’s art and pure philosophy which can be considered as thinking that is constrained by at least some structure. Academic philosophy constains it by some academic rigorousity. Mathematics constrains it by formal consistency. Then computation constraints that by computability. Or physics constraints that by data measured from physical reality. The more abstract science field gets, the more abstract factor analysis on top of data you have to do and lose predictive accuracy and gain chaotic nonlinear complexity.
Fundamentally all minds in themselves and languages are doing is labeling attractors.
Chaos language
Everything is just study of avarages over a chaotic system. Linear deterministic systems are attractors in a system that itself has nonlinear chaotic properties. Even more, it’s attractors in categories of intuition. Attractors themselves live in an atractor space and those too up to infinity.
Fun thing is, we can also explain the dynamics of philosophy itself in this language. But from philosophical assumptions that there is something and that classical causality is special case of interaction of attractors. One attractor attracts other attractor and no other attractors play a role. Just like how the cause of existence of the intuition of causality we have can be explained in the language of causality, we can explain attractor language by the attractor language itself.
This theory creates selfsimilarities at all scales and levels of abstractions of the reality explaining reality as one giant interconnected fractals of fractals. I claim that anything can be desribed in this language. Every other language is just some approximation in some modalities over this pure happenings having different types of possible implications and ways of more modelling over available data and predicting more data through explorative theory building. One can freely switch from low level chaos to different high level languages back and forth in the same sentence depending what feels good. Two dynamics are same, similar, isomorphic, have a 1:1 correspondence in terms of some abstraction when that abstraction over the two cases of dynamicds yiels the same result. Mathematics, programs, game theory, philosophy, causality, classic language, psychology, evolution, etc. are just abstractions over the chaos dynamics.
Chaos modelling
For example what that can be desribed in this language is the dynamics of mind or the evolution of life. Crab is the ultimate lifeform, a perfect attractor, just like how love is. Or evolution of art, music, political, epistemological, ethical, ontological, religious, social construct, language, model, any knowledge, univese, galaxy, planetary, atmosphere, human, animal, plant, ant, soil systems. Scientific, mathematical, code paradigms – it’s all trends like any other trend. Art style is like an ideology. Language is like a galaxy. Religion is like an animal. Ant is like a neuron. Thought is like a star. Cell is like a particle. Skill is like species. Category theory is like buddhism. The concept of everything is the sun of the universe. Anything is like a wave in an ocean. They are all systems of attractors in their own with different properties, some are linear, some have static laws and structures, some are deterministic, some are nicely apprimated when assumed as closed, some are open system so they interact with systems around them, all creating one unified system. The attractors that are the most stable stay and get their labels. If the concept of religion itself wasn’t attracted in some modality, then it wouldn’t be stable and dissolve and no such concept would exist, same for cats, shapes of solar systems, a math theory or structure of ant colonies. They combine nonlineary and phenomena like convergent evolution happens. They maximize fitness, adapting to the environment by knowing how to respond to it by modelling it in some simplified way reducing the element of surprise. Too complex modelling can get too specialized and not general enough, therefore it has space for too many edge cases, and takes more resources. Too general modelling on the other hand doesnt capture enough complexity, sometimes the resources from which the modelling emerges are more cost benefitial in the long run and the system stays for longer. Synthesis of two systems happen everywhere, as we can see with political ideologies for example.
Unifications of paradigms in science are synthesis of existing attractors into one, for example recent qualita formalism in mathematical neuroscientific modelling of consciousness is synthesis of different points of view of the data from the measurement of the nervous system and qualia into one with strong predictability power in a lot of modalities just like topos theory is a unification of different ways of looking at math. Many modalities merge into one, but every constructed point of view will solve some problems in some modalities better and in some worse. That implies it's so extremely hard to create a model in every modality space at one and I suspect we will never solve everything with absolute accuracy because for that we would need a theory of everything because it is a closed system and I suspect that would need infinite time and computability power and resolution or approximation of problems equivalent with the halting problem, like the spectral gap, in practice, and a separate model for all possible evolution of states of the universe because of the nuances in states that can get compressed into generalized models specialized for certain modalities always lose some complexity and interconnectedness with abstraction happening. They all are approximations of different topological attractors at some layers of abstraction and physics is great at that. Quantum mechanics on a low level, general relativity on a high level. It’s so hard to find attractors through layers of abstraction corresponding to the bridge between them and unify them in a nice way through classical mathematical means, maybe because they are approximations of different layers of abstraction that can be very nicely approximated as a closed system in terms of layers of abstraction because the attractors don’t interact with each other as much as we would expect and therefore it’s not so easily approximated in an interconnected way, but a lot of different approaches on the unification exist and are still emerging. Any systems of attractors considered form a new system of attractors. Some constructions more trivial or pragmatic than others. You can get to any possible meta level. Model the evolution of modelling the evoltions of modelling the mind or the evolution of different ways of thinking about different ways of thinking.
Mind