In full generality, general quantum system can be considered conscious according to various mathematical conditions on quantum or classical scales (all theories of consciousness, topological pocket in classical spacetime pointer state) with various overlaps between them. Do all topological pockets [- YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v==tX8b3ng37Nw) have a corresponding Quantum reference frame's cocone diagram implemented as Markov blanket classicaly?[ShieldSquare Captcha](https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2634-4386/aca7de) Most likely not the other way around. Is the QRF measuring topological pocket as classical pointer state? Before we test various theories of consciousness (turning off irreducible Markov blanket at the top of the hiearchy? [- YouTube]([- YouTube]([- YouTube]([- YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v==y0Jyj6LAb8g)))) phenomenal bridges? [Discussion: Chris Fields, Mark Solms, Michael Levin - YouTube](https://youtu.be/4Z8UPddh0e4?t==1287) [- YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v==3gvwhQMKvro) breaking some proposed fundamental neurophenomenological mathematical structure?) So far we can just believe the theory's mathematical consistency, existing empirical grounding and phenomenological correspondence. [Theories of consciousness | Nature Reviews Neuroscience]([Theories of consciousness | Nature Reviews Neuroscience]([Theories of consciousness | Nature Reviews Neuroscience]([Theories of consciousness | Nature Reviews Neuroscience]([Theories of consciousness | Nature Reviews Neuroscience](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41583-022-00587-4))))) [OSF]([OSF]([OSF]([OSF](https://psyarxiv.com/6eqxh)))) [Models of consciousness - Wikipedia]([Models of consciousness - Wikipedia]([Models of consciousness - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Models_of_consciousness))) I'm trying to stick to some one concrete model (qFEP and/or QRI) but at the same time not commit to any of them fundamentally such that i can compare, synthetize all other models on a higher order of complexity according to existing empirical data, predictive and explanatory power. So, if we wanna describe all natural scientific fields in one model using the quantum formulation of the free energy principle or overall quantum information theory and fundamental physics, we can use it to formalize the fundamental relationality of information in any other scientific discipline that studies arbitrary quantum systems that may or may not have classical correspondences in various models, where all models are useful approximations and evolutionary niches. [[2303.04898] A variational synthesis of evolutionary and developmental dynamics]([[2303.04898] A variational synthesis of evolutionary and developmental dynamics]([[2303.04898] A variational synthesis of evolutionary and developmental dynamics]([[2303.04898] A variational synthesis of evolutionary and developmental dynamics]([[2303.04898] A variational synthesis of evolutionary and developmental dynamics](https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.04898))))) All the mathematical models or differential equations used to predict dynamics in chemistry, biology, sociology, ecosystem science, astrophysics and so on are different special cases or approximations of those underlying quantum dynamics in quantum reference frames with holographic screens for communication that cause higher order causal information processing with agentic free energy minimizing modelling in nested hieachical bayesian graph and acting across scales. Can this be formalized as multiple cocone diagrams forming higher order cocone diagrams by informorphisms encoding higher order semantic information, a cocone diagram where nodes are themselves cocone diagrams, not just classifiers and semantics. Are the fundamental classifiers nonreducible information processing in physics, corresponding to the simpliest information processing of subatomic particles or excitations or loops or strings or something else, that together form collective information processing with shared context in a cocone diagram and that forms again higher order cocone diagrams up to theoretical infinity? Is this the nature of emergence of collective intelligences from collective intelligences? From (inert) simple interacting subatomic particles or other fundamental entity (that through entaglement form the quantum error correcting glue of spacetime) to atoms to molecules to cells to brain regions to brains to organisms [ShieldSquare Captcha]([ShieldSquare Captcha]([ShieldSquare Captcha]([ShieldSquare Captcha]([ShieldSquare Captcha]([ShieldSquare Captcha](https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2634-4386/aca7de)/meta))))) to communities to cultures to nation states to planetary systems to galaxies and so on, from lower order quantum information theoretic goals that bind and form a unit together getting higher order goals by this nested fractal cocone collective bayesian free energy minimizing information processing structure with top down and bottom up causality across scales performing active inference, where classical or quantum differential equations describing them tend to get more and more complex with increasing structural information processing complexity, but in some cases we can locate simple laws acting as good enough approximation for its context that can also sometimes be transposed across many contexts, is that convergent evolution of nature balancing between simplicity and complexity on all scales? [- YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v==gQu6Khs48gI) If we assume symmetry theory of psychological valence in neural field theory and bayesian network doing Active Inference consisting of a model of self and others and the world and abstract representations that may or may not be connected with predicting the real world that have various degrees of success. Is culture stable patterns aka shared context among many individuals? [2023 Course: "Constructing Cultural Landscapes: Active Inference for the Social Sciences"]([2023 Course: "Constructing Cultural Landscapes: Active Inference for the Social Sciences"](https://activeinferenceinstitute.substack.com/p/2023-course-constructing-cultural))https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361691550_On_religious_practices_as_multiscale_active_inference_Certainties_emerging_from_recurrent_interactions_within_and_across_individuals_and_groups [OSF]([OSF]([OSF]([OSF]([OSF]([OSF]([OSF]([OSF](https://psyarxiv.com/ygptv/)))))))) [Frontiers | Small steps for mankind: Modeling the emergence of cumulative culture from joint active inference communication]([Frontiers | Small steps for mankind: Modeling the emergence of cumulative culture from joint active inference communication](https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnbot.2022.944986/full)) Is art and music and dancing creating consonant patterns in the brain while reinforcing cultural patterns, reducing uncertainity through knowledge giving text, reinforcing sense of self and emotional and ontological fundamental bayesian priors of the individuals that all want to selfevidence, find themselves out there, corresponding to baseline harmonic modes in the brain? Is ethics different evolutionary niches resulting from our internal evolutionary pressure to feel connected to the collective? Is philosophy in general exploring the formation of arbitrary knowledge bayesian graphs? Is law studying governing top down algorithms restricting or allowing certain types of behaviors of units, creating some shared context to minimize chaos? Is economics studying the dopamine of the society? Is journalism studying the attentinal system of our society? Is military part of our immunity system? Is wellbeing based in efficient uncertanity reducing colelctive behavior of various information processing subagents in the nervous system creating symmetrical dynamics that is interconnected with having shared context with other humans and overall collective reduction of basic needs among time? Is metacrisis solving the cancerous dynamics, many misalinged active inference agents with the collective's long term wellbeing by strenghtening those aligned goals and reminder of interconnectivity and relationity of sciences and worldviews through education or AI assistants? Is consumerism hijacking our attentional limbic mechanisms and how we evolved to have lots of pleasure from things that used to be very rare in the past so that we would look for them (sugar, fat, important shocking news, porn etc.) For alignment and, do we cultivate culture of compassion. For wellbeing do we strenghten mental health knowledge and reduce environmental and information polution that destroys us? Do we strenghten democracy while teaching people about the metacrisis and polycrisis so that good political representitves are selected? What are the most effective interventions to our system that will a) increase the wellbeing of human population, b) increase collective efficient mitigation and resolving of symptoms and causes of risks and crises and c) making efficient material and psychological (that complement eachother) progress leading to flourishing. And how all those factors interconnect. How to make them respect, support and check eachother instead of fighting violently. Different people speak with different fundamental languages determining their actions so if one wants to change their action one should synchronize with their objective functions. Politics is a lot about the language of power. Corporations speak the language of money. Language of values. Language of ideology? Language of morality (appealing to politician's children's future life). Language of meaningful experiences and meaning in general. Supercooperators are the golden nugget against the metacrisis. What are the best evolutionary pressures for supercooperation clusters? Supercooperatior universities? Ctraining theory of mind and shared goal states via commpassion and dialog, psychedelics, meditation, unity, opposite of polarization, nonduality, cultivate holistic planetary awareness? Could massemailing people that have the biggest causal influence in determining humanity's trajectory while synchronizing as most as possible with their language lead to efficient evolutionary pressure towards a good third attractor that isnt dystopia like Russia and chaos like Somalia? What else is needed to make strong enough good evolutionary pressure in the evolution of societal architecture such that we dont selfdestruct eachother with existencial risks and environmental destruction? How to install altruistic dynamics into governing structures that are very much governed by power and money dynamics without becoming the memeplex transmittor of the language of power of money but instead a memeplex transmittor increasing chances of global supercooperation cluster? [Effective Individual And Collective Wellbeing Engineering - Qualia Research]([Effective Individual And Collective Wellbeing Engineering - Qualia Research]([Effective Individual And Collective Wellbeing Engineering - Qualia Research]([Effective Individual And Collective Wellbeing Engineering - Qualia Research](https://qualiaresearch.miraheze.org/wiki/Effective_Individual_And_Collective_Wellbeing_Engineering)#Effective_Collective_Wellbeing_Engineering))) [The Gaia Attractor. A planetary AI copilot network to overcome the Metacrisis | Rafael Kaufmann | Medium]([The Gaia Attractor. A planetary AI copilot network to overcome the Metacrisis | Rafael Kaufmann | Medium]([The Gaia Attractor. A planetary AI copilot network to overcome the Metacrisis | Rafael Kaufmann | Medium]([The Gaia Attractor. A planetary AI copilot network to overcome the Metacrisis | Rafael Kaufmann | Medium]([The Gaia Attractor. A planetary AI copilot network to overcome the Metacrisis | Rafael Kaufmann | Medium]([The Gaia Attractor. A planetary AI copilot network to overcome the Metacrisis | Rafael Kaufmann | Medium]([The Gaia Attractor. A planetary AI copilot network to overcome the Metacrisis | Rafael Kaufmann | Medium]([The Gaia Attractor. A planetary AI copilot network to overcome the Metacrisis | Rafael Kaufmann | Medium]([The Gaia Attractor. A planetary AI copilot network to overcome the Metacrisis | Rafael Kaufmann | Medium]([The Gaia Attractor. A planetary AI copilot network to overcome the Metacrisis | Rafael Kaufmann | Medium]([The Gaia Attractor. A planetary AI copilot network to overcome the Metacrisis | Rafael Kaufmann | Medium]([The Gaia Attractor. A planetary AI copilot network to overcome the Metacrisis | Rafael Kaufmann | Medium]([The Gaia Attractor. A planetary AI copilot network to overcome the Metacrisis | Rafael Kaufmann | Medium]([The Gaia Attractor. A planetary AI copilot network to overcome the Metacrisis | Rafael Kaufmann | Medium]([The Gaia Attractor. A planetary AI copilot network to overcome the Metacrisis | Rafael Kaufmann | Medium]([The Gaia Attractor. A planetary AI copilot network to overcome the Metacrisis | Rafael Kaufmann | Medium](https://rkauf.medium.com/the-gaia-attractor-41e5af33f3b7)))))))))))))))) [Comparing Approaches to Addressing the Meta-Crisis | by Brandon Nørgaard | Medium]([Comparing Approaches to Addressing the Meta-Crisis | by Brandon Nørgaard | Medium]([Comparing Approaches to Addressing the Meta-Crisis | by Brandon Nørgaard | Medium](https://medium.com/@brandon_29259/comparing-approaches-to-addressing-the-meta-crisis-9393e6ee17d7))) [How to Classify Projects that Aim to Address the Meta-Crisis | by Brandon Nørgaard | Medium]([How to Classify Projects that Aim to Address the Meta-Crisis | by Brandon Nørgaard | Medium]([How to Classify Projects that Aim to Address the Meta-Crisis | by Brandon Nørgaard | Medium]([How to Classify Projects that Aim to Address the Meta-Crisis | by Brandon Nørgaard | Medium](https://medium.com/@brandon_29259/how-to-classify-projects-that-aim-to-address-the-meta-crisis-5958a363faf8)))) Expand your caring cognitive lightcone to infinity! [What are Cognitive Light Cones? (Michael Levin Interview) - YouTube]([What are Cognitive Light Cones? (Michael Levin Interview) - YouTube]([What are Cognitive Light Cones? (Michael Levin Interview) - YouTube]([What are Cognitive Light Cones? (Michael Levin Interview) - YouTube](https://youtu.be/YnObwxJZpZc)))) [Entropy | Free Full-Text | Biology, Buddhism, and AI: Care as the Driver of Intelligence]([Entropy | Free Full-Text | Biology, Buddhism, and AI: Care as the Driver of Intelligence]([Entropy | Free Full-Text | Biology, Buddhism, and AI: Care as the Driver of Intelligence]([Entropy | Free Full-Text | Biology, Buddhism, and AI: Care as the Driver of Intelligence](https://mdpi.com/1099-4300/24/5/710)))) How far can it go? All humans and all future generations? https://imgur.com/a/vTsc5hW Some people generalize even more into keep entropy at bay with any intelligence even if it costs (human) consciousness. [Joscha Bach disagreement with Eliezer Yudkowsky on dangers of AI | Lex Fridman Podcast Clips - YouTube]([Joscha Bach disagreement with Eliezer Yudkowsky on dangers of AI | Lex Fridman Podcast Clips - YouTube](https://youtu.be/R5tNZnsuEM0?t==218)) But they usualyl define consciousness as substract independent information processing function so in their world consiousness is preserved. But im agnostic about which theory of consciousness is fundamentally ontologically true because of how many possibilities they are and its testability. More pondering: [- YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v==k55mAFCIQ60) [- YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v==HF-9Dy6iB_4) [- YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v==I8p1yqnuk8Y) [- YouTube]([- YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v==v-aP1J-BdvE)) [- YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v==GlOwJWJWPUs) [- YouTube]([- YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v==vSnq5Hs3_wI)) [- YouTube]([- YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v==vgYQglmYU-8)) [Quantum thermodynamics - Wikipedia]([Quantum - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum)_thermodynamics) [Quantum statistical mechanics - Wikipedia]([Quantum statistical mechanics - Wikipedia]([Quantum - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum)_statistical_mechanics)) [- YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v==x9COqqqsFtc) https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list==PLyH-Pa0827HcwPBS43z1Wj7hP_S-58I7J [- YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v==x3qGycr2uYk) [Von Neumann entropy - Wikipedia]([Von Neumann entropy - Wikipedia]([Von Neumann entropy - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Von_Neumann_entropy))) all classical is in the state of total decoherence. spacetime as entaglement glue. concrete quantum states with known particle's information are stable when isolated. the particle's information dissolves in decoherence when interacting aka entagling with the environment and its all lost. classical world is one giant beautiful emergent glued fuzzyfication. https://imgur.com/a/XElmC0l When we isolate quantum system with entagled particles with error correcting and so on in quantum computing - that prevents second law of thermodynamics from dissolving it via decoherence and disallows breaking time symmetry?. we're interesting entaglement networks. classical information (about relative position of particle, feline mortality statuses, object positions, tempature, for example) is mutual agreement (concenzus) of entaglement network encoding. by robust replication like error correcting. in quantum computers we want only concrete qubit in quantum logic gates computation. in classical world we get so much other classical information. we get shared relative spaciotemporal hallucination with subjective linguistic semantics. [Open quantum system - Wikipedia]([Open quantum system - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_quantum_system)) [Quantum - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum)_dissipation [- YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v==tFEfpamz5k0) no system is closed. no system is isolated. its on a spectrum tho. too open and one dissolves into entropy aka entaglement. are mental processes that are kept classically an entaglement network with those mutual agreements. but on psychedelics explode to even more entropy<->entaglement through all the open quantum subsystems becoming even more open, more correlated. its higher order entaglement, not just concrete particle entaglement (that might be minimal). is generalized universal wavefunction universal statespace of all possible statespaces. its von neumann entropy 0 for the universal wavefunction but its bigger for its subsystems because its the quantum state equivalent to classical state so we get classical probability possibilities of outcomes of measurments. in quantum computers we need to disentagle particles from its environment to get only isolated internal stable entaglement for computing that isnt interefered by explosive entagling decoherence with the environment. entaglement is just correlation between open quantum systems slowly killing its boundaries. any quantum thermodynamic nonqeuilibrium steady state is kept at bay by resisting entropy aka entaglement by internal error code correction. the more open the more entagled the more fuzzy. [- YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v==ImFPvQcdQT0) [- YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v==gZ90TXJNbb4) [- YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v==_fmBNpDEen4) dissipation of energy into the environment is loss of information. globally information is conserved. but local increase in entaglement leads to loss of information locally. at heart of quantum mechanics, unitarity is perservation of probability which is equivalent to time reversal symmetry and perservation of information and therefore energy. copenhagen intepretation breaks this. but its fundamentally dualistic assuming nonclassicality of obserever and so on. everett interpetation ftw. [Quanta Magazine]([Quanta Magazine](https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-most-famous-paradox-in-physics-nears-its-end-20201029/))