Major part of my meaning of life currently is to try to understand: - The most complete fundamental equation/s of intelligence: human intelligence, diverse machine intelligences (all sorts of current and future subfields of AI), other biological intelligences, collective intelligence, theoretical perfect AGI (AIXI variants, Chollet's intelligence, Legg's intelligence, etc.), hybrids, etc. - The most complete fundamental equation/s of the universe and the world in general: How does the standard model and general relativity work? How does everything else in our world on other scales with other fields, such as chemistry, biology and sociology, emerge? What is beyond the standard model of particle physics and general relativity, how to solve quantum gravity? Standard model should be called special relativistic quantum field theory instead of just quantum field theory to minimize confusion, because you can have quantum fields without special relativity Did you know that the expansion of the universe breaks energy conservation on cosmic scales? [Reddit: If the universe is constantly expanding, how is the law of conservation of energy obeyed?](<https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/11w9asm/if_the_universe_is_constantly_expanding_how_is/>) [True: The expanding Universe doesn't conserve energy - Big Think](https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/expanding-universe-conserve-energy/) maybe out heories are wrong, or maybe this is just the feature of our universe to by asi vesmír musel neexpandovat 😄 expansion breaking time-translation symmetry corresponding to breaking conservation of energy seems to be pretty solid 😄 hmm, koukám že existuje nějaká [Tired light teorie](<https://thedebrief.org/time-to-rethink-the-big-bang-new-research-suggests-universal-expansion-may-not-be-what-it-seems/>) nebo [Energy conservation drives the expansion of the universe](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.01269>) Složitost/komplexitu může entropie někdy jen aproximovat Maximální entropie je thermodynamic equilibrium (death of structure), a minimální entropie je perfect crystalline solid v absolutní nule, a obojí má celkem malou complexity tak jak complexity chápeme I když vlastně, ten vztah mezi těmato veličinama by šel možná popsat takhle v The First Law of Complexodynamics [Shtetl-Optimized » Blog Archive » The First Law of Complexodynamics](https://scottaaronson.blog/?p=762) https://x.com/burny_tech/status/1881056053510701482 I want to make every fundamental particle of the universe into an original character and create a cartoon series where they interact with each other. A photon character would endlessly shine light with wholesome energy, a gluon character would connect others together with the magic of friendship, an electron character would electrically power and energize everything possible, a higgs character would help others with identity, up and down quark characters would together through cooperation form structures in the world, strange quark and neutrino characters would be mysterious and ghostly, and then there would be a charm character, or top and bottom quark characters, and the colors of the quark characters could correspond to their color charge. You could explain how photons are visible light, radiation, x-ray. From big bang to now symmetry breaking. Vacuum decay. Zip zapping electrons. What makes all particles special. How's were particles measured in cern. Gravitons. Generál relativity. Tachyons. Loop quantum gravity. String theory. Causal sets. Quantum field theory. How was special relativistic quantum field theory discovered starting with aristotelian mechanics, classical mechanics, quantum mechanics. Higgs boson. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYcLuWHzfmE](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYcLuWHzfmE) https://www.flickr.com/photos/95869671@N08 https://x.com/burny_tech/status/1893072392160743719 [Standard Model - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model) [Mathematical formulation of the Standard Model - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_formulation_of_the_Standard_Model) [File:Elementary particle interactions in the Standard Model.png - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Elementary_particle_interactions_in_the_Standard_Model.png) [Reddit - The heart of the internet](https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2F866vvkcpzn301.jpg) [Components of the Chart](https://www3.fi.mdp.edu.ar/fc3/web_2009_2/Aventura/particle/cpep_components.html) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=asEtNJ9sRcQ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=asEtNJ9sRcQ) [Než budete pokračovat na YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8BCB4981DD1A0108) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Igl8hE3Eac0&list=PL8BCB4981DD1A0108&index=1](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Igl8hE3Eac0&list=PL8BCB4981DD1A0108&index=1) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Unl1jXFnzgo](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Unl1jXFnzgo) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=txxddKGs0Wo](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=txxddKGs0Wo) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=44k7cMj_kpY](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=44k7cMj_kpY) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydXpXjfeuYo](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydXpXjfeuYo) Where is my galaxy supercluster sized particle collider We need to test the complete limits of this simulation [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJZ1Ez28C-A](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJZ1Ez28C-A) yes, tak se počítá feynmanův path integral! [Path integral formulation - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path_integral_formulation) 😄 je to mega cool a je to generalizace klasickýho principle of least action co je v klasický mechanice, a relativita to má taky afaik alternativa feynmanovy path integral formulace kvantový mechaniky je např Shrondingers picture (klasická Schrondingerova rovnice) a Heisenberg's picture a Dirac picture [Schrödinger picture - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schrödinger_picture) [Heisenberg picture - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heisenberg_picture) [Interaction picture - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interaction_picture) je jich víc iirc všechny jsou si matematicky ekvivalentní! matematika za tím [Dynamical pictures - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamical_pictures) [Relation between Schrödinger's equation and the path integral formulation of quantum mechanics - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relation_between_Schrödinger's_equation_and_the_path_integral_formulation_of_quantum_mechanics) jsou ekvivalentní ve smyslu že dají úplně stejnou evoluci initial stavu kvantovýho systému, mají identický information content a kvantový počítače mají v sobě zase jiný typ kvantovýho paralelismu díky kvantovým superpozicím [[2405.07222v1] What is Quantum Parallelism, Anyhow?](https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.07222v1) Can we understand the universe beyond the Planck length? [https://youtu.be/2p_Hlm6aCok?si=GOqRtzwT3PkxmdHa](https://youtu.be/2p_Hlm6aCok?si=GOqRtzwT3PkxmdHa) Quantum gravity beyond anti De Sitter space [https://youtu.be/2p_Hlm6aCok?si=UpxtcYWtmMcHwjeG](https://youtu.be/2p_Hlm6aCok?si=UpxtcYWtmMcHwjeG) I mean I love exploring the space of all possible formulas and mathematical structures in applied/pure mathematics, or more generally all possible informal and formal thoughts in philosophy. But when it comes to physics, I think the issue is that you can come up with infinite amount of possible mathematical formulas, since the space of all of them is so large, then when it's not grounded in how it connects to existing or potential other physical experiments, to actually verify if the math is empirically predictive, then it feels like it's very arbitrary. maybe quantum wave function is not fundamental but emergent from something more fundamental according to superdeterminism interpretation of quantum mechanics [[2109.02676] The wavefunction as a true ensemble](https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.02676) [Superdeterminism - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superdeterminism) The whole universe evolves towards higher levels of complexity [Shtetl-Optimized » Blog Archive » The First Law of Complexodynamics](https://scottaaronson.blog/?p=762) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DP454c1K_vQ&feature=youtu.be](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DP454c1K_vQ&feature=youtu.be) Which theories of everything are the closest to truth? String Theory (vibrating strings, extra dimensions), Loop Quantum Gravity (quantized spacetime, spin networks), Causal Set Theory (discrete events, fundamental causality), Digital Physics (universe as computation, information fundamental), Asymptotically Safe Gravity (quantum gravity, high-energy fixed point), Twistor Theory (twistors fundamental, spacetime derived), Causal Dynamical Triangulation (spacetime from simplices, causality), E8 Theory (E8 Lie group, controversial unification), Gauge Theory Approaches to Quantum Gravity (gravity as gauge field, recent), Noncommutative Geometry (non-commuting coordinates, abstract unification)? Do you have some favourite attempt at a theory of everything in physics? I like Causal sets on vibe level. But I still need to dig into its math. "The causal sets program is an approach to quantum gravity. Its founding principles are that spacetime is fundamentally discrete (a collection of discrete spacetime points, called the elements of the causal set) and that spacetime events are related by a partial order. This partial order has the physical meaning of the causality relations between spacetime events." It's very Wolframian as well, but more accepted by academia. [Causal sets - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causal_sets)