[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1Ogwa76yQo](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1Ogwa76yQo) Juergen Schmidhuber developed Mathematical Universe Hypothesis before Max Tegmark Juergen Schmidhuber developed Ruliad before Stephen Wolfram At once Does nonequilibrium thermodynamics explain life? [https://youtu.be/g-hPcHKoMuY?si=l3_STyrVkaipy14N](https://youtu.be/g-hPcHKoMuY?si=l3_STyrVkaipy14N) What are the equations of life? the world is made of change AI systems aren't exact replicas of humans like many people seem to think. They're mix of insights from neuroscience/optimization theory/mathematics/physics/computer science/psychology/philosophy/empirical random testing/etc. into one system. Neuroscience: connectionism Optimization theory: gradient descent Psychology: reasoning, reinforcement learning Physics: diffusion Philosophy: alignment Control theory: reinforcement learning Biology: evolutionary methods Computer Science: computability theory - neural turing machines Our civilization will map every mathematical property of the universe with the help of AI Intelligence,AI,AGI,brain,physics,math,STEM,cognitive science,philosophy,complexity,foundations,consciousness,futurology! TESCREAL! Artists fell in love with their loss function Maybe we think in fuzzy metahypergraphs You could turn this into AI architecture: Art is an algorithm falling in love with the shape of the loss function itself - Joscha Bach [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6tQf7a3Ndo](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6tQf7a3Ndo) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyhJ9BEjink](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyhJ9BEjink) The largest superstructures in the universe, such as galactic supercluster complexes, share certain mathematical properties with both the human brain and current AI systems. [BOSS Great Wall - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BOSS_Great_Wall) [List of largest cosmic structures - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_cosmic_structures) [Hercules–Corona Borealis Great Wall - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hercules%E2%80%93Corona_Borealis_Great_Wall) https://x.com/burny_tech/status/1927767491180216479 What probably interests me the most currently when it comes to FEP: - What are currently the best FEP/Active Inference AI systems working right now, and how similar are they to other AI approaches - How to find mathematical correspondences between AI systems and the brain using FEP/ActInf https://direct.mit.edu/books/oa-monograph/5299/Active-InferenceThe-Free-Energy-Principle-in-Mind What fascinates me that both physics and most mainstream AI try to look for bottoms of a valley, where AI is using gradient descent to find local minima, and physics makes the action stationary on principle of least action Isn't it fascinating how we're all information processing systems made of same enough building blocks? Sean Carroll x Eric Weinstein is fascinating drama. I think Sean's responses were nice, and Eric dodged so many questions from Sean that asked him to make the theory more scientifically valid, it's fascinating tactics form Erik to dodge reality checks. But Dave's hostility is next level and idk what to think about it. But if there's not really any moat in Erik's model and he tries to say there is, then I guess such pushback makes at least some sense, to normalize him, and prevent more people being manipulated by him... And I'm a bit confused as Curt on his theories of everything YouTube channel seems to think there is some moat in Erik's model while Sean thinks there's no moat, so this makes me wonder how reliable Curt is, since I think he seems to have some expertise in this area and he also had great conversation with Sean and academics from the foundations of physics in his other episodes about ToEs. Maybe Curt is just infinitely open minded to everything, since he interviews people of all levels of quality with such open mind, which I in some ways resonate with. [https://youtu.be/DUr4Tb8uy-Q](https://youtu.be/DUr4Tb8uy-Q) " The BOSS Great Wall is galactic supercluster complex, one of the largest superstructures in the observable universe. The largest superstructures in the universe, such as galactic supercluster complexes, share some mathematical properties with both the human brain and current AI systems. Are largest structures in the universe like galaxy filaments conscious? https://x.com/burny_tech/status/1930059870708899919 " Why should Quran be the true "truth" one and not any other religious book i never understood this "my book is the true one and all other books of other religions are wrong" logic that religions use i guess i like empiricist scientific method too much, and religions assert arbitrary absolutist unfalsifiable claims with zero empirical evidence instead, or sometimes flat out lie about scientific evidence they often actively degrade one's epistemology Sure, and also probably for example tons of dogmatic creationist outdated models refusing to update according to new scentific evience [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSJmXGuufwI&list=PLybg94GvOJ9GWf3VGT8h6bGoXQbvjDlmZ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSJmXGuufwI&list=PLybg94GvOJ9GWf3VGT8h6bGoXQbvjDlmZ) Here they had a debate [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g5ah-nPrmPU](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g5ah-nPrmPU) Btw when it comes to the concept of God, my favorite is Einstein's God, that he got from Spinoza. Defining God = nature = universe. And in that framework you can argue that science is trying to figure out the source code of God, to get closer to God this way. That's compatible with science as it's not contradicting it. And I see it as a cool program you can install into your mind's software that generates motivation and awe qualia and you can enable/disable it, instead of some objective truth. [Imgur: The magic of the Internet](https://imgur.com/2STTcsx) But anytime any religion or cult or its followers directly dogmatically contradict scientific evidence, then I refuse that Let it be all kinds of Christian or Muslim etc. creationism (which lies around evolution, archaeology, anthropology and origin of life research), empirically false physics theories like flat earth or electric universe or religious cosmology, general science denial, etc. Not gonna lie, the very detailed empirically inaccurate models and worldviews that some of these folks come up with, often very much motivated by ideology, are still often really fascinating from the perspective of studying belief systems But screw anyone forcing me to accept their unfalsifiable dogmatic "truth" completely out of touch from scientific evidence And I think these belief systems still existing today is more destructive, because it makes a lot of these people attack the scientific method, a thing I value a lot, as it for example got us a lot of the modern medicine that we have today Evolution happens empirically. We have mountains of empirical evidence for it. We are refining the implementation details now. Some more predictive more fundamental model can come, sure, but it has to predict also what evolution predicts. That's how science works. Most creationist (Muslim, Christian and other) debates is creationists being absolutely clueless about the science, or straight up lying about it, motivated by ideology, not by scientific method. They don't want to do better science, they don't want to find more predictive mathematical model, they want scientific mathematical predictive model to be replaced with unscientific dogmatic unfalsifiable stories in this context. I'm fine with some other religious stuff as long as it doesn't attack science this way. Tons of creationists want scientific model of evolution to be erased from schools and replace it with the unscientific God created Adam and Eve story. They try really hard socially, politically etc. Fuck them honestly. For example Discovery Institute is a fraudulent Christian creationist propaganda disinformation machine mill that does this with lies. The issue with tons of religious people is that they put their arbitrary random stories and mathematical empirically predictive scientific models on equal footing, or bash the scientific models unscientifically, and try to replace the scientific models with their stories in schools. No. It's not on equal footing. Sure. Tons of scientists were religious. I like Einstein's God=Universe that doesn't contradict science, but see it as a fun mental program, not as some objective truth. But this doesn't excuse creationist crusade against scientific model of evolution in schools using lies just because it doesn't fit with their magical stories. They are actively aggressive about it. This is actively harming society and should be resisted. finetuned universe argument and multiverse aren't science, because you can't empirically falsify it, they're either fun philosophy to get some narrative-based intuition behind the math, or pseudoscience, depending on how people frame it how would you empirically measure that designer by "specified information" you mean this? [Specified complexity - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specified_complexity) But to be honest when I put on my philosophical openness hat on much more, instead of mainly scientific scepticism hat I do love the ideas of trying to find glitches in physics like if it was a simulation [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KT7K3z4RfwQ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KT7K3z4RfwQ) Or mathematical universe hypothesis by Tegmark where all possible consistent mathematical structures have physical implementions [https://youtu.be/F__elfR3w8c?si=hVghqqygY-pjxaL-](https://youtu.be/F__elfR3w8c?si=hVghqqygY-pjxaL-) I'm still open to that possibility Both worldview hats, and sometimes in some kind of combination, are fun Or I sometimes like playing with assumptions in philosophy of mind that aren't reductive physicalism, like idealism, or wehavenoideaism (edited) “ I want a visualization of evolutionary mutations of all words in languages ​​from different common ancestors over time with connections showing mutual influence over time and similarity visualized through color gradients or shapes of nodes and connections But I would like to make a similar evolutionary tree over time for all science, mathematics, technology, and philosophy, with how they influence each other over time, mutate, deepen, expand, merge into interdisciplinary fields and various unifications, new fields with new concepts arise, convergent evolution arises, etc. 😄 Or just some specific fields with their concepts like AI, intelligence, physics, cognitive science Or a similar visualized evolutionary tree could be great for stories, literature, shows, games, art, including the properties of those different characters and universes 😄 But also an upgraded visualization of the evolutionary tree of biology over time could be nice Or all the physical systems in the universe over time 😄 Or completely fictional universes, like Pokemon Or the evolution of completely alien creatures, or alien structures and concepts 😄 Or sci-fi technology of the future 😄 Or human cultures 😄 Or all these possible evolutionary graphs connected in one place Or an evolutionary graph of possible evolutionary graphs of all possible things I think a lot of that information could be mined from Wikipedia ” Langevin equation is mathematization of chaos and order [Langevin equation - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Langevin_equation?wprov=sfla1) Its absolutely fascinating that you can take any physical system, like the universe, earth, biological system, brain, social system, AI system, etc., and throw so much existing applied mathematics at it, and have a change of getting some useful predictive insight!