Divide unity into quantum gravity solutions, unifying fundamental forces, classical and GR emerging from QM (quantum darwinism, Sean Carrol), alternative foundations (string theory), physics concepts penetrating all subdisciplines: no hiding theorem, Black hole inf paradox and solutions to it Particles in QTF are excitations of quantum fields Automation section to engineering, computers, AI, metascience When we define science, we can automate it Divide math for physics to math for foundations of physics, math for classical physics, quantum, relativistic,... Metapoznamky AI art everywhere Book vs notes section, same table of contents Wiki description under everything Intuitive vs technical description Autinatized updating of new science Write pymdp math Percilation theory to neurogenesis https://twitter.com/lu_sichu/status/1714723110413316296?t=UXSKXcmnyQ8q4V6xw5t-Tw&s=19 Classical mechanics [Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Mechanics in Under 20 Minutes: Physics Mini Lesson - YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0DHNGtsmmH8) Newtonian mechanics Hamiltonian Lagragian Relativity [The Maths of General Relativity (1/8) - Spacetime and Worldlines - YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xodtfM1r9FA&list=PLu7cY2CPiRjVY-VaUZ69bXHZr5QslKbzo) Quantum mechanics [What is the Schrödinger Equation? A basic introduction to Quantum Mechanics - YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WPA1L9uJqo&t=3769s&pp=ygURcXVhbnR1bSBtZWNoYW5pY3M%3D) [The Hydrogen Atom, Part 1 of 3: Intro to Quantum Physics - YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Y0XL-K0jy0&pp=ygURcXVhbnR1bSBtZWNoYW5pY3M%3D) gravity is not reonarmalizable in QTF and breaks at high energy values [Why doesn't gravity fit into the standard model? - Quora](https://www.quora.com/Why-doesnt-gravity-fit-into-the-standard-model) [general relativity - Why is quantum gravity non-renormalizable? - Physics Stack Exchange](https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/488955/why-is-quantum-gravity-non-renormalizable) quantum electrodynamics [The Theoretical Minimum - YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/@thetheoreticalminimum2287/videos) Scott aarson quantum computing [Revealing the Truth About Quantum Computing With Scott Aaronson - YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLRE5OF5VF4) Great list of different field equations [Field equation - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field_equation#Classical_field_equation) Cognitive bias codex https://imgur.com/a/0RnP9QQ https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/BvFJnyqsJzBCybDSD/taxonomy-of-ai-risk-counterarguments I think technooptimism is good, but to some certain extend, I think we shouldn't be totally mindlessly 100% technooptimistic. I think we should care about certain degre of safety as well, but I dont think we should totally halt everything, we shouldn't be 100% technopesimistic. There is a middle way that maximizes the chances and degree of future flourishing of sentience! [The Techno-Optimist Manifesto | Andreessen Horowitz](https://a16z.com/the-techno-optimist-manifesto/) Entropy in information theory is directly analogous to the entropy in statistical thermodynamics. https://imgur.com/962ukGR metanote: I'm wondering if i should bottom up build physical reality as i do it now, first building math and explaining fundamental particles and cosmology (classical -> quantum -> relativity -> merging to QTF standard model), and then go to middle scales such as biology and sociology. Or should i bottom up build math (when i mention dynamical systems and classical mechanics i say everywhere where its applied, from small particles to big ones, as most of science is in classical framework, and explaining fundamental particles at the end because thats where i get to QTF math). If i should go into biology when i already explain enough math (most of it is classical so including it inside classical dynamical systems), or if i should postpone it after i explain fundamental physics fully first. Or first build all math without practically applying and then do a big section on just applications? But without examples that can be hard to grasp, and its almost impossible not to use examples when explaining physics without it seeming too abstract. It's probably better to keep the scientific fields together, instead of keeping maths together. Statistical mechanics of the US Supreme Court [[1306.5004] Statistical mechanics of the US Supreme Court](https://arxiv.org/abs/1306.5004) [How to Increase Your Willpower & Tenacity | Huberman Lab Podcast - YouTube](https://youtu.be/cwakOgHIT0E) Humberman Willpower Reform your habits, take control over your actions, cultivate effortless flow state in actions aligned with your higher meaning •Is Willpower a Limited Resource? •Relationship to Food Based Fuels •Ego Depletion Controversy •Role of Beliefs •The Key Brain Circuit for Tenacity •Science Based Tools to Build Willpower Neural correlate of free will Beliefs about willpower determine the impact of glucose on self-control [Beliefs about willpower determine the impact of glucose on self-control - PubMed](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23959900/) Levels of glucose avaiablity seems to determine willpower and tenacity Believing that willpower is unlimited leads to much more actual willpower The Will to Persevere Induced by Electrical Stimulation of the Human Cingulate Gyrus https://www.cell.com/neuron/fulltext/S0896-6273(13)01030-1 The tenacious brain: How the anterior mid-cingulate contributes to achieving goals https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010945219303326 Anterior Mid-Cingulate Cortex (aMCC) is a key hub for leaning into undesired effort. Your aMCC it is activated by engaging in behaviors that you don’t want to do. Your aMCC/willpower can grow throughout the lifespan by regularly doing undesired things*, that are hard. High achieving individuals have higher activity in aMCC Lesions or distruptions in aMCC cortical function leading to less activity in it show increased apathy, depression, learned helpesness and reduced levels of motivation and tenacity Succesfull dieters have elevated at rest and evoked activity in aMCC, but failure mode there is anorexia Obese people also have lower activity in aMCC Stimulating it makes people feel like something's about to happen, putting pressure on them, and they felt like they have to act and move with their will, urgency to resist, to push back, getting ready, being the forward center of mass. It communicates with so many other networks and redistributes glucose to different functional networks as energy to act. We can strenghten this network via learning to do things we resist, by excercise. This has insane implications for potential neurotech! Identify bad habits, use willpower to reform them by taking control over your actions and rewriting them, and then cultivate effortless flow state in actions aligned with health, needs and your higher meaning Sympatic parasymphatetic nervous system Category theory all concepts from Kan extensions Everything in maths canbbe build out of empty sets Everything in computer sciencr can be built out of anything from which you can construct a turing machine, such as NAND or XOR gates https://www.dialecticalsystems.eu/contributions/the-free-energy-principle-a-precis/ Quantum ML on climate change [[2310.09162] Quantum Machine Learning in Climate Change and Sustainability: a Review](https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.09162) PFC regulated decisions Brain global networks Functions of different brain areas Asymtotic gravity [Non-perturbative Renormalization for Quantum Gravity - Lecture 1 | Astrid Eichhorn - YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfuEQRJVovs) [Joscha Bach Λ Ben Goertzel: Conscious Ai, LLMs, AGI - YouTube](https://youtu.be/xw7omaQ8SgA?si=Yje5h8WWBno3ab-D&t=2945) https://academic.oup.com/bja/article/115/suppl_1/i32/233838?login=true In some experiment they gave people muscle relaxant throughout the whole body but arm and something that inhibits formation of long term memory and asked the person in the middle of the surgery to raise their hand if they were conscious and aware what is happening to him and they did, and if they were in big pain and they did too, but they forget it all after surgery. Does anesthesia do something similar? Suskind black hole information paradox solving by holographic principle [Can a New Law of Physics Explain a Black Hole Paradox? - YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLOHdW7dLug) there are some theories that aren't interpretable in ZFC but they're very much recognisable as in the mould of the mathematics we do do. https://shelah.logic.at/files/95333/176.pdf by a simple argument: For it turns out (by a result of Shelah (1984)) that ZFC+PM implies the consistency of ZFC and this implies, by the second incompleteness theorem, that ZFC+PM is not interpretable in ZFC. I refuse to be impressed by large language models until they get good enough to teach me Lurie's book on higher topos theory https://twitter.com/lu_sichu/status/1714312115182239984 [What is an intuitive explanation of the Laplace operator (or Laplacian operator)? - Quora](https://www.quora.com/What-is-an-intuitive-explanation-of-the-Laplace-operator-or-Laplacian-operator) Laplacian gives us a quantitative measure of the "spreading out" of the change of the field in space. Rational animations ending poverty [How to Eradicate Global Extreme Poverty - YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DUlYQTrsOs) Quantum error-correcting codes are essential for protecting information in quantum computers. They may also be responsible for holding our universe together. https://twitter.com/QuantaMagazine/status/1714350082722558253 [How Space and Time Could Be a Quantum Error-Correcting Code | Quanta Magazine](https://www.quantamagazine.org/how-space-and-time-could-be-a-quantum-error-correcting-code-20190103/) [[2310.09386] Quantum computing: principles and applications](https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.09386) Quantum computing: principles and applications Non-perturbative Renormalization for Quantum Gravity https://twitter.com/BahramShakerin/status/1714048383541711302 Biology of depression [The Cause of Depression Is Probably Not What You Think | Quanta Magazine](https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-cause-of-depression-is-probably-not-what-you-think-20230126/) Reviewing definitions of intelligence from AI and psychology and proposing formal definition of intelligence based on Algorithmic Information Theory, describing intelligence as skill-acquisition efficiency and highlighting the concepts of scope, generalization difficulty, priors, and experience [[1911.01547] On the Measure of Intelligence](https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.01547) [How to Increase IQ Levels: 8 Ways, Plus Increasing Your Baby’s IQ](https://www.healthline.com/health/how-to-increase-iq) [How to Become Smarter: 10 Ways to Boost Your Intelligence](https://www.healthline.com/health/how-to-become-smarter) AI math theorem proving [LEGO-Prover: Neural Theorem Proving with Growing Libraries | Papers With Code](https://paperswithcode.com/paper/lego-prover-neural-theorem-proving-with) Ontological vs pragmatic definition of free will, philosophical truth vs feeling [OSF](https://osf.io/dnw5k/) Distributed Science - The Scientific Process as Multi-Scale Active Inference Verses Automating science Animated algebraic geometry It may seem that one day I share/post different opinions and content than other days. I am not in any camp. I try to be not fully eaten by any one overconfident/ideological/tradition/field attractor as much as possible. I am exploring superposition of all knowledge/ideologies, steelmanning and synthetizing them all. Though I have some more rigid vectors, such as semiutilitarism for ethics and bayesianism for science Limits of ideologies in defining evil https://fxtwitter.com/RubenLaukkonen/status/1714466886879191491 Nervous system is nested hieachy of subagents, of interacting loops across scales [Paper page - Approximating Two-Layer Feedforward Networks for Efficient Transformers](https://huggingface.co/papers/2310.10837) Approximating Two-Layer Feedforward Networks for Efficient Transformers Instead of Christianity, Islam or other religions/ideologies/cults/other concrete cultural frameworks dominating globally, I would prefer secular open spiritual movements (like mindfulness movements) combined with rational enlightenement to tackle bigger humanity issues beyond individual cultures. Lots of mainstream Christianity feels outdated in many ways, not fast enough with adaptation for humanity to not selfdestruct globally and minimizing suffering using empirical methods. I see lots of good in it that's relevant for the current state of the world, take that and synthetize them with other religions and secular cultural frameworks. Spinoza's God=Nature is IMO ideal and I often implement it in my mind for pragmatic purposes. But I'm open to many other as long as it doesn't increase the chances of humanity's state getting worse (wellbeing, progress, sustainability,...) Even Christian dogmatism is sometimes useful, but too much of it feels like failure mode. For example closedmindedness to different types of thinking that might have its own advantages and disadvantages in different contexts. And tolerating different types of behavior that might not be destructive at all in this context, like judging people having sex before marriage. I dont adopt Christian framework because they're not general enough in maximizing wellbeing and sustainability globally and closes the mind against other frameworks, where all the different types of frameworks include something useful for the benefit of all sentience but any one framework system isnt enough. I believe one should be constantly openminded to new perspectives and religions or cults tend to go towards the opposite - not all and not all subgroups tho, which is good. So I hope humanity wont become strictly Christian, but also not totally closed to its insights. Nuclear war is one of the possible extinction scenarios, and friction between religions/ideologies/cults from the degree of dogmatic closedmindedness, nontolerance, nonhumanism etc. isn't helping. But I see the value of them in stabilizing communities and societies through social cohesion using rituals, shared thinking and patterns in behavior etc.. But I want a sweet spot that won't lead to death and suffering. Is the recent war middle east a dispute over land, or about which cultures dominate over a region, and how that cultures are defining themselves, and highly fluid organizational, legal, religious, ethnic and social constructs being tied into these definitions in various complex and contradictory ways? I want to minimize the total amount of suffering and death (possibly globally) by any means of organizational, legal, religious, and social construct transformation. Same in Russia x Ukraine. Depending on what kind of (neuro)biomarkers you are optimizing, each person has a subjective sweet spot that maximizes advantages and minimizes disadvantages on the degree of how masturbation/sex impacts his mental and physical health in good or bad ways, highly influenced by his biology and culture he's embedded in. Higher chances of prostate cancer and bigger psychological stress versus tolerance inducing overly stimulating reward circuitry and possibly cultivating deeper human connections in certain contexts. Evolution Universal darwinism Telomeres [Nintil - Telomeres: everything you always wanted to know](https://nintil.com/telomeres) Factors influencing intelligence Factors influencing sense of free will https://fb.watch/nLt5Mv_A53/ I dont think physicalist reductionism where everything can be reduced to interacting fundamental particles contradicts emergentism, free will etc.. I think even in this paradigm you can still measure crossscale causal forces with all scales existing at the same time. No scale could exist without the others, creating mutual interdependrnce with possible mutual causality. I see causality as statistical property. And those causal forces can still be explained in the framework of interacting fundamental particles using zooming out mathematics. You can argue some scales can be substrate indepedent if you see them as higher level of abstraction through weakly emergent dynamics on higher scales. And one can still from information theoretic perspective argue this is still our useful model that predicts empirical data the best, so its true scientifically, but really itself goes beyond all models we dream up. Approaches to measument problem 7 Japanese Techniques To Overcome Laziness https://twitter.com/Philosophy_Call/status/1714504732268704048?t=ubJB-GGTywianf6-uBcuJA&s=19 This paper argues that the rise of mental health problems in children and teens is largely a result of kids having less opportunity to play, roam, and explore without constant adult oversight. [Redirecting](https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022347623001117) Can a "theory of everything" explain complexity from atoms and molecules to societies? The answer is negative, and even within physics, emergent, irreducible phenomena exist. https://twitter.com/ricard_sole/status/1714286897483399639?t=WgF8rBDQ6-Zbrq3aozePug&s=19 The World as Evolving Information [[0704.0304] The World as Evolving Information](https://arxiv.org/abs/0704.0304) This paper discusses the benefits of describing the world as information, especially in the study of the evolution of life and cognition. Traditional studies encounter prob- lems because it is difficult to describe life and cognition in terms of matter and energy, since their laws are valid only at the physical scale. However, if matter and energy, as well as life and cognition, are described in terms of information, evolution can be described consistently as information becoming more complex. The paper presents eight tentative laws of information, valid at multiple scales, which are generalizations of Darwinian, cybernetic, thermodynamic, psychological, philosophical, and complexity principles. These are further used to discuss the no- tions of life, cognition and their evolution. [Humanism - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outline_of_humanism) This Four Quadrant Model Explains Media Manipulation [This Model Explains Media Manipulation - YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X5jqE76o6qs) Quantum Machine learning is overhyped https://twitter.com/DulwichQuantum/status/1714376219762847752?t=IBWjNKIRUDbltXR-9bHK3g&s=19 Stuart hameroff [Stuart Hameroff: Orch OR, Penrose, Fractal Consciousness - YouTube](https://youtu.be/uLo0Zwe579g?si=BneD9lg01_VrVd1e) Increasing IQ and memory [Anthony Metivier: Increasing Your IQ & Memory Tricks - YouTube](https://youtu.be/t8laPMEQOUQ?si=CCUBsMMJg8tt1LNS) Relational interpretation of QM (Carlo) Physicalism Informationism Defining information: [entropy - What is information? - Physics Stack Exchange](https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/2685/what-is-information) information contained in a physical system = the number of yes/no questions you need to get answered to fully specify the system "information is a measure of one's freedom of choice when one selects a message"; or more correctly, the logarithm of that freedom of choice. Information is thus more clearly understood as a the number of combinations of component parts that are available to be chosen arbitrarily predictive or postdictive capability, i.e. information is what enables us to state what the outcome of a measurement was or will be (locally). measure of randomness associated with a string of letters Wiki: Information is an abstract concept that refers to that which has the power to inform. At the most fundamental level, information pertains to the interpretation (perhaps formally) of that which may be sensed, or their abstractions. Information is never lost according to QM The no-hiding theorem states that if information is lost from a system via decoherence, then it moves to the subspace of the environment and it cannot remain in the correlation between the system and the environment. This is a fundamental consequence of the linearity and unitarity of quantum mechanics. Thus, information is never lost. This has implications in black hole information paradox and in fact any process that tends to lose information completely. The no-hiding theorem is robust to imperfection in the physical process that seemingly destroys the original information. [No-hiding theorem - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No-hiding_theorem?wprov=sfla1) All matter is physical information https://academic.oup.com/book/410/chapter-abstract/135212317?redirectedFrom=fulltext Philosophy of Space And time (Hoffman, Carlo) Archive everything referenced Newtons law Einstein Field equations [Jordan Hall ‚Äì Global Politics and Civilizational Redesign - YouTube](https://youtu.be/hJsWRNurV9g?si=KPZ90ZTHt8ZuY4UW) Jordan Hall – Global Politics and Civilizational Redesign Quantum computers are using low tempatured and quantum error correcting codes to stabilize the superpositions of particles from outside petrubatory decoherence forces Maybe Feedforward algoritm in brain Types of string theory [Episode 45: Leonard Susskind on Quantum Information, Quantum Gravity, and Holography - YouTube](https://youtu.be/XTSdPSOcdjI?si=o9MHud_lWcZiWzk5) String theory is a mathematical framework for physics String theory says that QM and gravity can fit together but might not be in our world Information hides inside black holes is one solution, but black holes evaporate and its gone anyway Black hole hawkins radiation has to have information that black holes ate by duplicating it into it so that QM conservation of information isnt broken, but you cannot dupe information in QM (no cloning theorem) Or could you duplicate information but nobody in principle could detect the fact that you duplicated it in similar way how uncertainity principle says you can't detect both the position and momentum of a particle in QM even if it might have both (or in everetian interpretation of QM there's just wavefunction without position and momentum of particles), so you cannot measure both original and duped information in attempt to detect both information coming in and out