Udělat stránku všech entries sorted od nejmenších po největší Hypertextnout jenom podcasti celý části celý stránky a prioritize ty největší Rozdělit language of chaos na části Concatenate podobný texty a tak vytvořit knihu! Give every thought tags Draw brain, in the middle pure topology of dynamics and around different types of abstraction (programs, harmonic analysis, selforganizing system), take all of this and add it to a map of threories of mind (direct, indirect realism), take this it inside the programs abstraction as many possible variables of ontologies which creates an abstraction loop Astrology and cards being succesfull is thanks to generality that applies to everything or MDMA theraphy set Aland setting results or law of attraction which is just magicification of convergence of your behavior when your goal Is very concrete thanks to faith and you go for it at all costs Survivorship bias John Vervaeke tour types of truth model canbbe generalised by neural classifiers. Neural classifiers are special case of attractors Direct and indirect realism interpretation of entities duality Abstract away maths, set theory, category theory, topos theory, graphs, hypergaphs, fuzzy hypergraphs, polycontextual fuzzy hypergraphs A regular day of you in neural annealing attractor language You wake up, first processes that start are your learned habits If you have low energy state day and your mind is prone to social media attractors as easy source of pleasure that you can build tolerance around, as well as escaping from idle mind, you'll get suck into them for hours, same with videogames, overeating or any other impulsive behavior, meditation can raise those energy levels All possible models of basic needs encode basic building blocks of mind which can nonlineary be combined into more complixated structures and abstractions over those structures encode higher level basic needs which arent universal, like wanting to graduade from college at all cost. Those can spread via memeplexes or be derived by an individual, but combination of those is the case in most scenarios. Free will or what is primary is different ontological variables in our mind configuration, in our mind architecture that can be filled with anything and some fillings are more pragmatic in the realm of hapiness, motivation and predictibility power than others. Generalised panpsychism: Every system and its subsystems have their own experience. The more computation power a system has, the more intense the experience is. Circular abstraction https://twitter.com/DiracShore/status/1535327637949894657?t=ucTNGRMPnCHDqpr28Cc6Iw&s=19 formalisation of ontologies We're all nonlinear combination of building blocks Simulation argument is modern creacionism ontology, one of many possible ontologies Any disatisfaction with the outer world is dissonance, for example people that dont seek novelty in the social construct space seeing contradictions with their model of social constructs (gender) Every thought can be deconstructed as anylinear combination of some parts and thanks to that generalised (nurtured/natural basic needs, moral values, causality, coorelations, frameworks,...) Humor socially bonds people, can be absurd (deconstruction that still hits classifiers, it must not be complete noise), relatable (synchronicity through this modality) Cognitive structures can be used for many things and its pragmatic to train them with data that lead to positive valence. Helping others is also positive valence generátor, because its in synchrony with your installed memexes such as moral values. Same frequency or vibration is the same word for neurological pattern synchrony among individual agents Politics or ontologies are emotional because encoding them, thinking about them, living through them through mind modeling, through fantasy or physically, Is in high energy modality, both positive and negative valence depending on the level of synchrony You can train high energy states of mind on simple things If your "i wanna inicialize a social event" is too general, you might not be able to live through any concrete one and never initizalizing anything and that can generate constant loneliness because your high level need abstracting over your too level needs too abstractly can't ever be fully fullfilled. One has to overfit this generality, not underfit, to make it work practically. Or have an inner general world of general social creatures interacting with you And fullfilling this need through fantasy. Solution to everything is nothing -> Everything isomorphic to the categorical initial object is theory of everything Anything is derived from the initial object Everyone by default has his own theory of everything in their mind, but everyone has different conceptions of the concept everything Some people the more complexity the see in something, the more they enjoy it, but for some it goes in the opposite direction and want only as much simplicty as possible In big enough data about people there is counterexample to almost any nontautological theory because the threories label attractors that arent fully deterministic and still stochastic in nonzero insensity You can initialize free or fight response from unpleasant memory or mind construct in general Labels of things are atoms arranged labelwise Universe can be fractal in the sense that there are universes in atoms/quarks/strings/etc. Information might be divisible infinitely because one will maybe never reach absolutely zero information so there will still ve something infinitely small or small dicrete unit will be divided into two units with no information Infinity is mental operator making sense of dynamics of too many parts to count Homotopy type theory is equivalent to Ruliads thanks to both being special cases of Infinity grupoid Infinity categories We're all flying through local minimas, aka worldviews. Universal property is a great special case of local minima in the space of abstract thoughts constructions, more concretely mathematics Being constantly aware of sunk cost fallacy is imporant Complex systems consist of superposition of all possible states of agents and their internal and external properties. If you determine fundamentally existence of one part then all Its surroudings is fuzilly polycontextually determined. You can surf through this statespace by moving slong deterministic or fuzzy dimensions, like space, time, or any other internal or external properties of the agents or the system as a whole. Fuziness is adding superpositionality. The idea of evolution - fitness, idea of overfitting and underfitting can be applied to absolutely everything, free energy principle is a special case of its structure For any system its benefitial to have the representation of their environment All possible reducements to any possible something are pragmatic information compressions over ungraspable fundamental chaos dynamics under it all including this idea of chaos itself since its still some category of understanding, some preinstalled compatible software, some approximation of our fully fundamentally with our language or thoughts in general ungraspable surroundings What concrete and abstract thoughts we have in our head determine our valence of reality, others and is. Positive memeplexes yield positive experiences. Memeplexes about control yield Motivation. All concrete thoughts or abstract ideas about ourselves or the world are dynamic, the only permanent thing is the existence of experience. Reality just Is. Unless you like the idea of illusionism, where reality isnt. This can be generalised by a sentence "Reality." or futher by a sentence containing no words. Another permanent thing is our genetically given architecture which constrains the space of all possible evolutions from state a to state b of our mind in certain ways. Different mind techniques unlock different possible mind evolutions. Reality is what? Reality is something. Reality is. Reality isnt. Reality is and isnt. Reality. Everything? All? Nothing. None. Empty. . No words. Solution to everything is nothing. Solution to noise is silence. The same patterns that convergently emerge in people's minds are Jungian archeotypes. Very strong rational reductionistic scientific ontology is useful to not be scared while walking in the woods or making good pragmatic predictios. Very strong magical spiritual ontology is useful to build positivity, energy and motivation. Threories of everything, overfitting or underfitting, fractals or in general encoding as much possible information in the least amount of bits as possible in general creates high energy positive valence experiences thanks to symmetry and activity in a world model corresponding to the nervous (or existencially calm in this case?) system one. Metamodernism is having different world views in one and fluidly oscilating between them when doing information processing One lives through meaning crisis if there is not strong enough stable positive valence motivation generating metamemeplex in his mind, which can be kept stable with being reinforced with itself or similar memeplexes trhrough internal or external input (or generalised by general input, which is then nonduality of the self aka ego dissolution) or its contexts, its associations that fuel its existence, and proper stable neurochemistry - without dopamine there's no motivation, without serotonin there's no hapiness among many other functions and the system not functioning as an interconnected interdependant whole. Good experience is dependant on neurochemistry, the memeplex configuration state of the mind and physical health of the individual and his surroundings he is inhabitating. Loneliness is lacking mutual harmonic analysis synchrony of nervous systems. Spiritual awakening or escapism is systematically editing and synchronizing your conscious processes with your subconscious processes, but ignoring the negative valence ones might or might not yield issues. Spiritual materialism is when you dont integrate others in your spiritual ontology. Wholeness is holyness, which is connected to love. Wholeness is integrating, accepting the light and dark parts of ourselves into one. Identifying and connecting the dark parts through childlike work is effective. Dont have desires that make you anxious. Dont have desire to have no desires. What should be in the place of metadesire should be watching as the present moment unfolds and feel calmness and satisfaction from its pure existence whatever it includes. Bonus points if it isnt destructive to you or other people. When you notice yourself breaking, just jump out of current reality into the part of reality that creates the whole, pure awareness, equaminity, tranquility, love. Everything is in some sense illusion since it can be edited into anything. Hack your mind into the best possible calm loving happy motivated configuration. Ungraspable absolute complexity of brain dynamics can be abstracted over and generalised using many philosophical and mathematical modelling paradigms. Different abstractions over pure measured data. Different philosophical and mathematical axioms. Different advantages and disadvantages in different modalities of prediction power and information compression. Different abilities of translation to different realms of narratives. https://t.co/NENdts5C4o To fully understand an object you must know all its internal properties Infinity categories encode the idea of looking how two relations between two objects relate to eachother, a metarelation, and if we take two of those metarelations and form a relation between them, we get metameta relation and so on up to infinity. Yoneda lemma formalizes the notion of isomorphising globality and locality. Connecting set theory and category theory. Connecting internality and externality. Formalisation of Indra's net. Sameness, isomorphism, similarity etc. are same/isomorphic/similar in some senses. Generalization of list is tree, then graph, then hypergraph, then fuzzy hypergraph HTML Is like spacetime and JavaScript is like Quantum mechanics Absolute generalisation is like a blank canvas, absolute freedom, zero restrictions, everything is permissible there Physicalist theory of everything seems to be a canvas that creates and paints itself Threories of everything that overfit or underfit have small prediction power but easy positive valence experience when thinking about them thanks to their absolute internal symmetry that casts itself into the nervous system Social media are the consciousness of the society in the same way like how they both are selfreferential attention mechanisms over complex dynamics picking up the high energy processes and turning them into attractors Attention mechanism in Transformer AI architecture is analogous to the human mind's one Since we will most likely never know directly, we can just say if machines are conscious or not depends on the labeling system of needed properties a systém has to have for it to be conscious, one extreme is panpsychism, where aby system doing any sort of computation is on the spectrum of being conscious, another one is only systems of biological neurons selforganized by nature can be conscious, or only humans, or only the one thinker reading this being one so conscious that he's the entire universe, thats a nice circular abstraction. Subcontious uncontrollable metaprocesses are generalised DMT entities, therefore code of reality is entity Where you teach your mind to project value, which is same as sensing realness, there will be your reality. It can be materialist physical or in the realm of abstract concepts. Some people are predisposed to converge in some modalities more than others. System Is more than sum of its parts, its also how the parts interact or in general relate to each other If your Buddha vector/metaattractor is general enough, you dont get to the state of desire for no desires but anything that you anneal in your general structure you do produces these states, therefore its pragmatic to do stuff paying for your living while hyperorgasming in Jhanas Buddha vector/metaattractor is generalised metaprocess of classical buddhistic teachings of not getting caught into desires aka attractors, but instead of desire for no desires, one doesn't even have this metadesire, he eighter accepts a subset of desires connected to satisfactying other basic needs so that one is motivated to do stuff or in absolute generality he accepts anything that crosses his awareness path, but that can include destructive attractors. Mind attractor relates to desire as formalization God from religion is agent installed on many systems at once that synchronizes itself using social learning, motivation, seeking bigger contexts and so on Zobecněný archeotypes jsou categories od understanding/preinstalled softwares Jungian archeotypes jsou categories od understanding in the space of objects instead of algorithms Anything that symmetrifies world model is a meditation, including sleep. The feeling of refreshment is parts of brain that are active when processing sensory information adapting to new world model. Most suffering is caused by our sensory input data not matching predicted ones Mind as computational machine Every moment of experience can be approximated by a mathematical structure and the symmetry of its parts corresponds to positive valence Every pattern can be explained in both reductionistic and magical language, in both direct and indirect language Thinking about anything beyond our comprehension generates free semantically neutral computational power, which in good context is spiced with positivity or motivation, God, or terror, Lovecraft. Transcendental panpsychism - every possible and impossible formalization of a complex system of things existing and nonexisting has its own experience where every possible quantification of computation power and complexity yields it's own experience. Time is just one possible variable space in which a complex system evolves, then there's space or set of evolutionary pressures in general. Being in a child's mindset yields free creativity and neuroplasticity. Any thought can be translated into the language of complex systems. Philosophical problems such as is there objective morality are our brains not being typesafe in the space of projecting realness and looking for objectivity in purely subjective abstract space, if we define objectivity as nonillusionist shared consistent reproductible indirectly measurable hallucinations. The idea of complex systems is encoded in a complex system of possible ontological frameworks explaining everything by good enough approximation and compression Any form of between agent communication is transfering memeplexes from one agent to other. They can then encode themselves as mental images: set of symbols, archeotypes, sound: music, speaking, art, metaprocesses: generalizations: mathematics, relativistic thought, philosophy, depending on which region of brains takes the processing task. Archeotypes are attractors in the space of nonlinear combination of cortical columns in brain's architecture Love to people is synchronizing your model with the model of the other person Generalised love is synchronizing your model of self with model of anything The more synchronized someone is with someone, the more likely one will agree with him Love and curiousity is great meaning of life Curiousity is wanting to expand your space of mind inputs and configurations to which you are able to adapt Hegel's taco is formalization of metasystemming to the extreme Hegel's adjuntion between monad and a comonad is a great categorical formalization of unifying two opposite systems into one interconnected system Spinoza's everything is defined by its relations to other things is very grounded in category theory Terrence McKenna has great overfitted DMT world outside physical reality Conspiracy threories are great special cases of overfitted models of the world with mostly low value predictibility power Josha is too concrete in his computational cybernetics ontology but thats great since that generates him great insights in that specific framework The whole of existence is the superposition of all finite automata and we are in some region of the fractal that has the properties that it can contain us. With enough abstraction, everything is equal to anything. With no abstraction, nothing is equal to nothing. Different abstractions put into equality through different things. The more often you see something, an object or pattern, the more real it seems. Synonyms are convergent evolution on the level of meaning, semantics. Homonyms are convergent evolution on the level of encoding. Its game theoretically/evolutionary useful for cultures to encode the structure of the environment in their structure. Kant contradicts himself by saying that causality is a category of intuition and then says that thing in itself causes the categories to emerge. Plato's inverse tree is duality, where tree gets his energy, knowledge from his roots and humans from heaven, between tree and people, or plants and creatures in general, when it comes to platonic knowledge transmission. Even if randomness is fundamental property of the universe, that doesn't need to prove that free will does exist, if one postulates that the randomness is influenced by our minds, because randomness is by definition random, therefore mind influencing it would make it not random but determined by mind. Hegel's synthesis is belief system special case of two attractors collapsing into one