language for unity of knowledge under one metaframe, comparision, integration, if two models have empirical grounding and are fundamentally incompatible, finding a compatible model on higher order of complexity to account for as much empirical data as possible with one model, and assuming that no one single concrete model can predict all of reality and just together approximate different parts with different successes in different domains using different tools, assumptions, lenses that are not allencompassing, with predictive and explanatory advantages and disadvantages in relation to different contexts making the least amount of pragmatic assumptions possible with greatest integrative and explanatory power (occams razor) [I am therefore I think. KARL FRISTON - YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4KeYkwcJoc) I start with no philosophical assumptions, nothing, potential for everything, and to ground it in something as minimal as possible as universal as possible I use pragmatic empiricalism with free energy principle as guiding algorithm that is ontologically agnostic/fluid agnostic and then start with fundamental mathematics that can describe physics, consciousness, or monism and then emergences or derivations or mathematical approximations or describing different scales to unify all science fields mathematics and possible nonmathematics and create a playground to compare and synthetize all the predictive models we have in science and mostly focus on models that try to understand consciousness and societal dynamics for wellbeing, from everything we collapse the full potentiality probability wave function into a concrete symmetry breaking subset of "coherent" language [ActInf Livestream #040.0 ~ "A free energy principle for generic quantum systems" - YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-qZYxSbJ38E,) that into subset of epistemological seeking, that into subset of ontologically agnostic/fluid pragmatic empiricism guided by free energy principle protocol [Karl Friston's Unfalsifiable Free Energy Principle - YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZ1fsXQz7M4) that into reductive or nonreductive fundemantal physics (quantum field theory or holographic principle (AdS/CFT correspondence with spacetime as quantum error correcting code [Is Spacetime a Quantum Error-Correcting Code? | John Preskill - YouTube](https://youtu.be/SW2rlQVfnK0) [The Holographic Universe Explained - YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klpDHn8viX8)) or/and loop quantum gravity [Loop quantum gravity - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loop_quantum_gravity) with emergent classical spacetime or/and amplituhedron with emergent particle interactions without spacetime locality) as physicalist/idealist/monist implementation for markovian conscious agents or quantum free energy principle outside spacetime (nonlinearly interacting emergence of timelikeness updating of dynamics of agents that communicate nonlinearly in subjectively relativistic physical and phenomenal sense of time) as sensemaking (idealist or physicalist, illusionist, panpsychist or existence of system's subjective experience constrained by mathematical constraint) (not only) biological systems (which also explains the emergence of the beggining of this text in our mental models and emergence of all mental models in general (thoughts, memories, feelings, psychological valence, attention, awareness, spacetime, isness) with most of the time approximately fuzzy or strict topological quantum hiearchical bayesian causal graph neural network structure governed by brain physics (all the existing quantum or classical theories of consciousness in panpsychist, illusionist or something in middle, or monist? interpretations) as useful evolutionary data compressing uncertainity reducers) with space and time as optical error correcting codes in topological neurophenomenological dynamics (using neural field theory, quantum field theory) (also describing theories of wellbeing or enlightenment (absolutely unrestricted unknotted unified symmetrical state) in physicalist or more high level neuroscientific networkian or computational etc. classical mathematics and how it may be related to interaction with the genes and environment in whole physical system) (or idealist conscious markovian agents or monist quantum free energy principle from which physics derive as useful mental interface) and universal scalefree free energy principle and other concrete or more universal (physics) (maths) models in general that have nice explanatory power in various contexts, that predict systems better than noise in physics or act as guiding future creating protocols such as in sociology, it is included in some level of this interconnected graph of models for fundamental physics, overall physics, chemistry, biology, neuroscience, phenomenology, sociology (models of collective sensemaking, cooperation, wellbeing, risks, polycrisis, metacrisis, positive statistics, resilience, psychological and technological progress, corresponding current statistics and preventing strategies, solutions to causes and symtoms and adaptations, possible ways of turning the titanic around into positive third attractors, models of present, past and future), environmental science, astrophysics, cosmology, philosophy, ethics, politics, spirituality and all their interdisciplionary intersections and so on, with nodes meaning causality, emergence, special case, or other similarityness, enabling to notice mathematical correspondences between them by noticing various deflating symmetries and their advantages and disadvantages in various contexts and for mathematical models corresponding compatible approximating philosophical and ontologies, stories and visualizations to ground those models into minds that are evolutionary optimized to thinks in stories (idealism, physicalism, monism, various interpretations of quantum mechanics (relational, many worlds), everyday analogies) but there are also models without maths that can guide in ethics and sociology, that all can be explained as emergent evolutionary phenomena in our minds in physicalist frame, and juggling between and transcending closed, empty and open individualism todo: incremental build up of framework and its contents, methodology, resources? collpse of societies Science communication of physics to people that know almost no math is pretty hard, one has to use imagery and stories and analogies that somewhat slightly bring closer to or approximate it. Many argue if it makes it right or wrong. I see a lot of arguing that sociology or philosophy could be often explained in less technical academic words. I would argue that the advantage of technical jargon is useful for encoding more complexity in a lot of situations, but also not always. Also if its maths then it can be simulated. But often people look for insights for everyday life in the studies and get bombared with the jargon they dont need in their context and get angry. Here science communication that approximately translates it to less jargon language is also needed IMO. Also AI and consciousness is even more fun with the concensus chaos. Book format top down: Total freedom, potentiality for any symbolic or nonsymbolic structure FEP for modelling anything, intelligence Ontologies Picking one unified model of reality out of many, we need more empirical data: Scalefree QFEP+Quantum Darwinism+spacetime from entaglement in unified ontology ^Emergence of all science fields as different subsets of different scales Consciousness (all models, classical, quantum) Wellbeing, agency, compassion, meditation, psychedelics Sociology Wellbeing, Metacrisis Other science fields Other thoughts Bottomup? Wellbeing in brain Consciousness models from simpliest classical to QFEP Psychedelics, meditation, intelligence Applying QFEP scalefree Emergence of all science fields Sociology wellbeing metacrisis Ontologies FEP for modelling anything, intelligence Total freedom, potentiality for any symbolic or nonsymbolic structure Other science fields Other thoughts Science communication of physics to people that know almost no math is pretty hard, one has to use imagery and stories and analogies that somewhat slightly bring closer to or approximate it. Many argue if it makes it right or wrong. I see a lot of arguing that sociology or philosophy could be often explained in less technical academic words. I would argue that the advantage of technical jargon is useful for encoding more complexity in a lot of situations, but also not always. Also if its maths then it can be simulated. But often people look for insights for everyday life in the studies and get bombared with the jargon they dont need in their context and get angry. Here science communication that approximately translates it to less jargon language is also needed IMO. rarefap/raresex as alternative to nofap to keep it magical (in rat nsfw group) I vibe with QRI's and quantum free energy principles's ontology and try to unify them - physics models are also consciousness models, that approximate the substrate of physics that is the substrate of consciousness - quantum field theory, quantum darwinism, spacetime from entaglement, quantum loop gravity, holographic principle, quantum formulation of the free energy principle, or other fundamental physics models, or other quantum or classical models used in physics and modelling consiousness - whatever you choose and synthetize, its also describing consciousness, and individual experience in a qFEP's quantum reference frame implemented as bound by neural synchrony or quantum coherence (neuronal superpositions) or QRI's topologically segmented pocket or other solutions or some synthesis of those. The question if we can construct a physics theory that can predict everything in total accuracy is also deep, because we're local observers with finite modelling capacity and computational power (bounded rationality), but its the best we got, so assuming unity of underlying physical substrate with topological fieldlike information theoretic dynamics being substrate of consciousness that we approximate with various unifying physics models is IMO the best we can assume for doing science, aka creating predictive models that give us the agency to manipulate reality with technologies or psychotechnologies derived from them. I prefer rarefap/raresex as alternative for it not loosing magic. Doing it rarely to supercharge sexual experience though enhanced intensity, drive, spirituality, love, magic, thirst for life, creativity and so on, minimizing disadvanategs and maximizing advantages, and less in high doses narrowing addiction means more sense of global meaning which used to be a problem to me, not bombarding the reward circuitry, letting it recharge, but not totally abstaining from it. Timing (potent or hyperpotent) reward sensory stimuli (porn, high sugar/fat/E621 food, yummy stuff on social media,...) induced endorphin/endocannaboid/opioid/etc. releases to not build too much tolerance but also not doing anything at all leading to for longer time unused resource of them that doesnt increase in size anymore by more recharging, maximizing total amount of euphoria qualia and overall wellbeing qualia, or similarly with psychedelics I believe there is optimal threshold where the total sum of euphoria from such rewarding activities is maximized by choosing some perfect intervals between them. (essencially computing integral) (that is dynamical and individual) My dynamics are probably unique because of my extreme hypersensitivity to all stimuli. There's only finite amount of energy (computational power) and reward circuitry reinforcement loops, tolerance and so on. But those circuits can when used wisely generate very pleasureful or deeply meaningful experiences. And it can be used to reinforce certain activities by seeing it as a reward after completing some bigger task, or the reward must be not known because then it stops being a big reward, so ideally when the intervals between are random, which generates this kind of motivation to fullfill those tasks (among many other types of motivations such as nonsexual social connection) Also I would argue there's a big difference between just not so meaningfully fapping and a whole process of sexual intercourse with foreplay, tantric interconnecting, cuddling, slow sex, (instinct driven) fast sex, postcuddles, sleep, that's very healing thing! As much rhythmic entrainment as possible. [Ecstatic apes: absorption, flow, trance, climax, and orgasm via rhythmic entrainment - YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxKtfNRKXpM) I start with general definition of entaglement: noseparability General definition of classical information: pointer states that went through decoherence's natural selection (spacetime, spin, momentum, some classical comprehensible property that isnt just probabilstic wavefunction) Perception is entaglement through relativism Binding is information theoretically entaglement by nonseparability of those qualia They might be nonentagled particles, but the whole experience is nonseparable fundamentally, but we can separate part of our experience and that also kind of goes through decoherence into classical information (decoherence is lost of relationality, loss of globality) Entaglement is kind of like emergence here Topological pocket implies classical spacetime's "objective" relativistic location pointer state [Holonomic brain theory - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holonomic_brain_theory#Deep_and_surface_structure_of_memory) by quantum coherence (neuronal superpositions) spacetime emerging from entaglement now seems to work on both global physical and local neurophenomenological level In full generality, general quantum system can be considered conscious according to various mathematical conditions on quantum or classical scales (all theories of consciousness, topological pocket in classical spacetime pointer state) with various overlaps between them. Do all topological pockets have a corresponding Quantum reference frame's cocone diagram implemented as Markov blanket classicaly? Most likely not the other way around. Before we test various theories of consciousness (turning off irreducible Markov blanket at the top of the hiearchy? phenomenal bridges?) we can just believe mathematical consistency and phenomenological correspondence. [Theories of consciousness | Nature Reviews Neuroscience](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41583-022-00587-4) [OSF](https://psyarxiv.com/6eqxh) [Models of consciousness - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Models_of_consciousness?wprov=sfla1) all classical is in the state of total decoherence spacetime as entaglement glue concrete quantum states with known particle's information are stable when isolated the particle's information dissolves in decoherence when interacting aka entagling with the environment and its all lost classical world is one giant beautiful emergent glued fuzzyfication When we isolate quantum system with entagled particles with error correcting and so on in quantum computing - that prevents second law of thermodynamics from dissolving it via decoherence and disallows breaking time symmetry? we're interesting entaglement networks classical information (about relative position of particle, feline mortality statuses, object positions, tempature, for example) is mutual agreement (concenzus) of entaglement network encoding by robust replication like error correcting all classical information is error correcting code? in quantum computers we want only concrete qubit in quantum logic gates computation in classical world we get so much other classical information we get shared relative spaciotemporal hallucination with subjective linguistic semantics do psychedelics fuck with the mutual agremeents? disentagle us with our shared world? or we are still entagled but with added crazy mutation of possible interpretations that are never disconnected from our classical world tho no system is closed no system is isolated its on a spectrum tho too open and one dissolves into entropy aka entaglement are mental processes that are kept classically an entaglement network with those mutual agreements but on psychedelics explode to even more entropy<->entaglement through all the open quantum subsystems becoming even more open, more correlated its higher order entaglement, not just concrete particle entaglement (that might be minimal) is generalized universal wavefunction universal statespace of all possible statespaces when we measure a particle we isolate it from the universal wavefunction not taking in account its entaglement with everything but getting information on that scale that is kept there via it being a pointer state aka mutual agreement in the entaglement network replicated everywehre in the network its von neumann entropy 0 for the universal wavefunction but its bigger for its subsystems because its the quantum state equivalent to classical state so we get classical probability possibilities of outcomes of measurments in quantum computers we need to disentagle particles from its environment to get only isolated internal stable entaglement for computing that isnt interefered by explosive entagling decoherence with the environment entaglement is just correlation between open quantum systems slowly killing its boundaries any quantum thermodynamic nonqeuilibrium steady state is kept at bay by resisting entropy aka entaglement by internal error code correction the more open the more entagled the more fuzzy dissipation of energy into the environment is loss of information more entropic internal structuring is (potential for) increase of information tho! globally information is conserved but local increase in entaglement leads to loss of information locally at heart of quantum mechanics, unitarity is perservation of probability which is equivalent to time reversal symmetry and perservation of information and therefore energy copenhagen intepretation breaks this but its fundamentally dualistic assuming nonclassicality of obserever and so on everett interpetation ftw entaglement between two systems is also the degree of openness of the systems leading to correlations mmmm openness of the space time information merging in space and time when you dont measure the space and time of a particle/system in a wavefunction the superposition is like the system's nonseparable parts internal disconnection from our sense of space and time 2nd law of thermodynamics creating entropy creating entaglement killing space killing concetrated energy and thus information evolving in time but globally total amount of energy and information is conserved by perservation of probability with time reversal symmetry what resists and survives in this chaos and doesnt entangle into everything and dissipates all information to everywhere is the classical world of quasistable systems i love how shannon entropy is special case of it according to Neumann its generalization of thermodynamic entropy into information theory amount of hidden information in a system apparently Neumann told Shannon to call it entropy as he didnt realize it 😄 one way to think of it is the more possible outcomes an event has, the more Shannon entropy it has Von Neumann entropy generalizes it to the quantum and its the heart of quantum information theory whole wavefunction of two entagled particles has von neuman entropy 0 because the wavefunction has all the information about the system you can gather but the isolated entangled particle has von neumann entropy bigger than 0 since there's hidden information in the rest of the wavefunction, making its entropy equivalent to classical particle in statistical mechanics i like the connection that more entropy leads to more possible configurations of the system and therefore more information is contained in it entropy is life i think i managed to get into a more deconstructed state than before much more easier access to "see" clearly contructedness of everything making it dissolve when evaluated as not needed for fundamental survival everytime a certain subset of qualia is classified as a construct, it dissolves, but this process must continue recursively, seeing the constructedness of the deconstructors infinitely quickest way to stressless transcendental void beyond all but including all resting in transcental conceptless void, so much inner defragmenting and unification